Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-5619531-20140411125117/@comment-5619531-20140411165409

Mystreve wrote:

Okay, then. Why not throw Zalgo's name into the hat as well then? Or Moose? Their edits don't seem to meet the stringent administrator requirements that Fatal outlined either, judging by their recent stats. Why just Kill1mes? Fatal admitted he is friends with him on Facebook. Did the two have some kind of falling out we don't know about? Something seems off-kilter.

This isn't starting shit. It is just based off of what Fatal said in his OP.

"Kill hasn't just been inactive for a week, he rarely edits which is understandable because the iPad experience isn't exactly friendly. Even so if he can't keep up with the amount of editing expected of him then there is no reason he should have administrator rights."

So then, what's expected of him (or others that don't meet the standards in your head), Maria. Enlighten us all. I can be of aide to him. Zalgo is inactive. Meaning that he may be busy with life issues, and such. As Sloshed said in a thread of inactivity between mods/VCROC/administrators (since the wiki was experiencing inactive administrators at the time), an administrator has 3 months of inactivity, without providing a note as to why they are going to be inactive for a long time. As of Moose, he is active. But he is one of those users that spend their time in the chat, and Tumblr (by the stuff that he posts inside the main chat). I believe someone has the preserve of the Moose demotion thread, maybe. I have no clue, to be quite honest with you. And, also. I am an honest man, Kill and I have not have a dispute between such actions that may take offence to me. I am friendly to those that I encounter at first. Kill has done nothing to me, and I have not done anything to him to provide a strong disliking between our mutual friendship.