Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24841732-20140513005445/@comment-5619531-20140513174116

I just think that there shouldn't be prerequisites in choosing members.. It's good that you guys are volunteering to create a team, but it should just be those who want to volunteer, those who can crack down a story bit-by-bit and says "Okay. Here's what's wrong with it..." The length of the team doesn't really matter. If someone goes inactive for a week to a long period of time, that doesn't mean that they're going to be kicked out of this "team". Just as long as they go back into reviewing

This stuff isn't going to be "YES. YOU'RE A GREAT REVIEWER ! !!!!!111" or "You're not active enough in the threads and your reviews do not explain what's wrong with it, so ". It should be those who can actually crack down the story. No process needed. In the last thread about this, it's not going to be made into a right. A lot of opposes happened because the requests that you offered for the right were pointless. Just go on their talk page and ask them "Hey. Wanna be in this team?" and they reply "Sure." or "No."

That's pretty much what I think, and I think that it shouldn't really be treated as a "serious right", like VCROC, or administrator. Just form a team, ask an administrator if you can create a template for the team that you guys compiled, and poof. The team is formed.