Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-25428589-20181007231724/@comment-26399604-20181008140947

+Proposal 1

I think Hopeless does bring up some valid points about Rollbackers but I believe the rules for the role can be enforced just the same as an Admin -- if the role is abused then their privileges are lost on the spot (dependent on the severity of the infraction) or if the community believes a Rollbacker is abusing said power then use the demotion thread.

I think the level of promotion from Rollbacker --regardless of what could be added to the role-- should remain the same to achieve Admin. Instead of adding a new role between Rollbacker and Admin, why not just add to the position and increase the requirements to achieve it?

If anything it's a better way to gauge a potential Admin versus going from just changing titles to mastery over all things good and evil of the wiki. That's a lot of power to be thrown into the lap of anyone new to the role and with this new implementation they can ease into it.

I do like the idea of being able to edit protected pages as well.

+Proposal 2:

Enough said about this. I think we can all agree on this. I'll be happy on whatever reasonably number is chosen.

+Proposal 3:

I would at least like to try it and see if it's a fit or not. At the very least, it should be clearly stated not to be mistaken for the Site Question forum otherwise you'll see every question under the sun appear here.