Board Thread:Site Policy/@comment-6296238-20130606233146/@comment-5643552-20130608063645

Floyd616 wrote:  Support - but with limitations. I think we should base this type of policy on the original wiki, Wikipedia. On Wikipedia, anons are allowed to chat and to make minor edits such as spelling corrections. If an anon makes any edit larger than a spelling correction, it must be approved by an admin, and all edits must have a summary submitted detailing what was changed. I think this would make a could compromise between both sides here.

Wikipedia isn't the original wiki, but it is certainly the most archetypal.