Board Thread:Administration/@comment-11333115-20131214154535/@comment-5946174-20131214160823

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

The Bitter Cold wrote: What purpose could such a lockdown serve? You cited "instability with the policies," but I'm not quite sure what is meant by this. Rules may be abolished because they were outdates, ineffective, pointless, etc. Conversely, they can also be added if a known problem needs to be dealt with. Prohibiting any change to the rules for a period of four months seems pointless to me.

Note: I'm withholding my vote until I understand the reasoning behind this. The reasoning behind this is so that people cannot stir up issues about the chat rules 24/7. If you'll look now there is a thread up about changing the rules to make them more strict for insults because a handful of users got offended. That is not acceptable to do this, and believe it or not it happens the most during the summer and winter months. The solution is to have a set of guidelines a person must follow when protesting or suggesting that a rule be implemented. I don't see how preventing any change from taking place is helpful in the slightest.