Talk:Letter to the Editor, June 2004/@comment-26475800-20170718194235

This was pretty good. There were a few places that could have been cleaned up a little, like the friend of the writer being the aunt of one of the kids, could have just been mentioned as the aunt. But besides things like that, this was really well written.

That being said, something was missing from this. Everything was incredible vague and only hinted at things, which would be realistic in such a letter. But there could have been more answers. The scare factor was more hidden than most stories, which is done perfectly, but it's missing something and I don't know what. Maybe if the letter wasn't to the editor of a newspaper, but to the board that would be better. Have them reading it out at a meeting and interjecting different comments on what was being said and how close the person is to finding the truth.

Overall, this is one of the better stories on this site and there's not really much that could be changed. The things I mentioned above were just opinions, but not needed. Very well done.