Board Thread:Administration/@comment-24376429-20140226203353/@comment-4715955-20140303044348

CreepyStoriesRUs wrote: Xelrog T. Apocalypse wrote: CreepyStoriesRUs wrote: You accuse me of making a hypocritical post? It is not bad grammar because you hate my opinion, please do explain what is bad grammar and report to me if you so choose. CreepyStoriesRUs wrote:

Neutral because [no "of"] I am against [add "it"] for poor wording and for it if you have the powers or help from others of high ranks. Done.

Even after that, your statement doesn't make a lick of sense, though. All I can gather from your argument is "I don't know this Rarity person and if I don't know her she must be some new hot-shot staff member making up rules just to puff up her own ego." Which is beyond ridiculous as an argument and completely not true. Does that mean I have terrible grammar? No, it either means you don't understand the quality of the words I chose or you just want reason to argue. Bad grammar is different from just understanding. Likewise "purple prose" is different from "quality words". It's tough to understand you because in trying so hard to sound sophisticated, you end up just sounding like an alien tourist.