Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24841732-20140905122952/@comment-5619531-20140912235955

This can help out a lot. I was going to suggest that users put down REVIEWED on a thread so that the administration cannot do it. But the thing that is making me vote neutral is these questions: "If my story is reviewed by a user and an admin edits it to make it reviewed, does that mean that people will ignore the post?" "If an admin thinks a users review is a decent review and that it benefits them, will my story get the tag, even though I may not like the review?"

I'm that one type of user who likes to have different views on my stories until I feel like that my story has been ripped apart. As of now, my latest story on the Writer's Workshop board, The Darkness, has gotten decent criticism, but not a lot to where I think that it's good enough to post it on site. And it is one of the stories that is ignored to where a user replies on it within a 10-15 day period. Will an admin mark it as reviewed as several posts are marked decent? Or will an admin mark it as reviewed with a lot of posts, and most of those posts are viewed as good reviews?