Board Thread:Chat Discussion/@comment-24463401-20140608232520/@comment-731871-20140610012452

Lil' Miss Rarity wrote:

Scorch933 wrote: I got no problem with ChaoZStrider becoming a mod again, but split personality shit, and vocalizing that on the site instead of keeping it to oneself is very unprofessional and if it's a disqualifier for *other* people's applications, we can't make an exception.

Then again, I would just love to talk about Sarah and this particular little quote: "inb4 that was several months ago. And isn't really relevant to the current situation. Although yeah that turned out to be a huge mistake." About how old issues don't apply anymore, Yet, you ALL seem to hold SO MUCH against me. Hypocrisy.

WAIT! Let's talk about how Maria just got back on the site, and first just "asked" for moderator, and then *asked* for admin. No applications as far as I know (as per policy)! I mean, respectfully, if there was one, I would hope any user on here would correct me, and I would certainly correct my speech and facts. True I did do that without application, and it was wrong of me. But Skelly said yes, and as much as you guy love to turn to "higher powers" to resolve your conflicts I did the same. OH OH SURE, but it was against policy. How many times are you willing to go against policy for yourself, or are you going to make another exception for ChaoZStrider? Seems real convenient how you can twist the rules to your own ability. If that's the case, then Skelly broke policy is what you're saying. But I never saw LOLSKELETONS reprimanded, or even confronted about this.

So it was Wrong, and you've done a lot of right I admit that, but you did a lot of wrong too, and you seem to be able to admit that it was wrong, but where's the regret? I mean, you can admit it was wrong, MONTHS after the fact, like you think it doesn't even matter anymore. Funny thing is, I can apologize for a lot of BS in the past as well, but you guys are holding that against me. I don't speak up in an issue without getting "Scorch, you speak out EVERY TIME against us" or "YOU PERSECUTE US" or "you just hate us", when that's obviously not true.

It was against policy. And by the way, as much as you guys "love to make snarky comments about my actions", those Higher Powers don't really "resolve" conflicts anymore. They're lazy and they act like it didn't happen. When you push, it's "You're causing drama." or "No, they're doing their jobs, just 'differently'." or even "It's the users responsibility to deal with trolls and spammers. If you wouldn't play in and give them attention, they'd stop coming. It's not the moderator's responsibility to ban them, it falls on you."

Yeah, I think you know one of those.

@Chao: For all the talk and stuff about Split Personalities and Mental disorders in the Leadership Roles of this website, there seem to be SOME people on one side of the spectrum where excuses are made, and then others where it's actually applied. I hate to say it, but for people like Zyranne 1: getting lied to about the reasoning for denial, and 2: being disquallified for "mental situations" when, we've got people like you and Maria with such situations.... And now you trying to get modship back and somebody like Maria just denying you...

it's laden with both hypocrisy and near two-faced bigotry towards people. That's my piece. Not like it's really going to make *any* difference. I know most people usually disregard whatever I say anyway just based on the username and the fact that there's a lot of consensus and conjecture that I'm just some subversive punk who *lives* to get at the admins' throats and try to get people banned or demoted.

I'm not even going to bother fighting that claim because I know how pointless the fight is.