Board Thread:Administration/@comment-11333115-20131214154535/@comment-7055616-20131214161404

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Prince Weaver wrote:

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Prince Weaver wrote:

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Prince Weaver wrote:

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Prince Finneow wrote:

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Prince Finneow wrote: nou thanq What would be your reason for opposing? well, what if we need to change rules? You never really NEED to change the rules, they have stayed almost the same for months. Can you give scenarios for such events? Because people will ALWAYS think up new and creative ways to annoy the living fuck out of each other.

You seriously think things would stay the same over 4 months? No, they wouldn't. You don't need to make new rules to deal with annoying users.

All you have to do is ask them to stop, and if they don't then kick. The fact is, rules need to be flexible to deal with new and unforseen situations.

Therefor, I this. They already are flexible. There is one rule in there that can cover literally anything thrown at the chat. If you ask them to stop and they keep going on with it then you can kick/ban them for it. And then you get people bitching and whining at you because you kicked and banned them for something that isn't in the rules, which leads to more kicks and bans and bitching and whining.

The rules are there to prevent us from having to kick and ban users, they are also there to guide new users in the ways of the chat. Not in the rules? It is plainly stated IN the rules. And what I just said sailed over your head completely.

Alright, lets say new user joins and does something that annoys people, I kick him, and he comes back on and moans because what he was kicked for isn't in the rules.

How are people meant to know what and what not to do if new problems cannot be added to the rules?