Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-5590118-20140921233707/@comment-5590118-20140921235858

CassistRabbit wrote: I don't quite understand why this would be necessary. There is already a lot to edit and read as it is (12,000+ articles and slowly increasing) and this sounds like a lot more work to be managed by the editors. Not a lot of the users here are that active either. It sounds more of a burden then it does a help, at least on this wiki. We already have a fairly high visitor and editor count as it is. It isn't too much to manage. Encyclopedic articles are easier to monitor and write as they are purely based on citable facts. As it stands a project like this could very well attract more editors who would be interested in such a project.