Board Thread:Admin Applications/@comment-3999760-20130103045050/@comment-4883034-20130122152624

XanCrews wrote: Kind of curious though... I'm not going to say I don't support the idea. I scoured your record once I read this and you check out. Why are multiple bureaucrats needed? I just would like you to make your case in a more convincing way than the initial post for this. We have plenty of admins on the wiki that we could all be assigned something by cleric or ourselves and cleric can work on his bureaucrat duties by himself.

Seriously, we have a metric butt-load of admins these days. Every time I check on the list it just seems to grow. I know I'm not exactly the most active admin around here, with edits, but I take the initial role I took on as a disciplinary arm of the admins pretty seriously and I am on the wiki every day scanning for things that need to be fixed or malicious behaviour. We're doing a pretty good job these days and the admin team is strong, I don't get the chance to punish as much these days.

Anyway back to the main point... Using your own words, Why can't each admin just be more active (or be assigned a specific role such as cleanup admin or banning admin etc...) while Cleric does his bureaucratic duties?

TL;DR

I like you and your record checks out, I just want something more specific as to why you want bureaucrat status.

As Cleric is the only one that can assign admins and rollback and mods he has a lot to do, he needs to review the record of the user and a bunch of other stuff. That's a lot of work for one person. So Slosh being a Bcrat would ease that load off Clerics back. Why are you set on having an odd number of Bcrats?