Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-36052213-20180802015552/@comment-36292647-20180802021654

from what you have posted in this thread very little of it shows the mood that you try to ascribe to it. In all, it seems like you have taken a few examples of, at best, questionable comments and made them out to be more mean and demeaning than they actually read.

1. In the first image he is just adding a response to someone else's review. Was it a particularly good comment? No, not really. But at the same time this is in no way harassing the author of the original comment. Demeaning? Possibly. Harassing? You haven't made the case.

2. His response in the first image is less harassing and more telling the truth. Most of the content on this site contains themes and details meant to unnerve you, make you feel uncomfortable, or otherwise. Furthermore, the rest of the comments in the thread are clearly aimed in response to Helel and not at the new user. Lastly, if Cleric had an issue with his response then I am sure that Cleric could have said or done something about it on his own. Case not made.

3. In your third example he literally goes on to compliment the writer on his story and his ability to get it published. In this very example it is the author that seems like he could have taken offence to his comment, which was not demeaning and instead complimentary. Case not made.

4. I can't comment on this one to any great extent because it seems that the behavior in question takes place on a platform external to the wiki. I am of the opinion that while it is wrong to refer to someone by a name they no longer feel comfortable with anymore this isn't necessarily a case for a demotion, rather some form of discipline.

5. The blog was added back to the site and the information is still public. As an admin though, it is kind of his job to take care of things like that without consent. At this point the situation could have been, and indeed was, resolved within the administration which resulted in the blog being put back up. Deleting a blog is not in of itself a reason for demotion. Case not made.

6. I am not convinced that there is anything malicious and hostile here. If anything it looks like he was just talking about slimebeast and the issue he may pose or has posed against the wiki. While I am not the one to get caught up in any sort of inter-site drama this is also a seemingly poor reason for demotion and, as with the last 4 point, you failed to make that case.