Board Thread:Administration/@comment-4832646-20140831003335/@comment-25328560-20140902164300

TheEmptynessAroundYou wrote: Princess Callie wrote: TheEmptynessAroundYou wrote: CassistRabbit wrote: TheEmptynessAroundYou wrote: Just to push the writers, I still think it should be Second Person View. I'm saying right now that I will probably not contribute at all if it is second person. I don't write in that style, I find it restrictive and too challenging to be fun. I find that the restriction challenges me as a writer, allowing me to do more with that style of writing, and when I produce a successful piece in that style, it's all the more beneficial, emotional wise. 2nd person means that it's referring to the reader. You did this. You were here. We're doing this from different individual points of view from different characters. It wouldn't work, thus why I left it out. The reader isn't going to be the sole protagonist. I know exactly what Second Person is. It's mostly used in rituals, by  I find its quite fun to play around with. I think we should do third person ommnipotent, that way we have a few character options since a whole slew of people are going to be writing on this