Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-1290332-20131101200348/@comment-5034072-20131103143611

SheyGrell wrote: Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

SheyGrell wrote: You do indeed have the right to govern content on here. After all, you're admins. If you didn't do those kinds of duties, why would you be in this position?

But the way you handle a subject like this is *not* the way to go. You're supposed to set the example here. You all talk of 'setting the bar' for low standards... Maybe you should take a look at yourselves & low you've set the bar for behaviour towards others.

In the end, this makes me more upset than angry. Blaming a creator for the influence their creation causes is unacceptable in this case, no matter who you are.

I am hoping so much that you can see any kind of reason in what I say here. Rather than looking for a fight, I just will not stand for people in your position to exercise your power in this manner. I realize this will mean nothing coming from me, but until you can put your unfair outlook aside... How dare you call yourselves admins. As long as you act this way, you don't deserve the rights you mention. From what you say, and what I understand, you think something is unfair or unjust. Could you please clarify what it is? Okay. Here's what I see going on here;

- Due to how you impliment the anti-spinoff rule, you're seriously suggesting that a cretor is not allowed to make a sequel to their own creation? I have a feeling that no matter what I come up with here, there's going to be some kind of bullshit that you'll bring up about it, saying how it's necescary. Well y'know what? Let's go for the most prime example here; JC-The-Hyena & Sonic.exe. You deny him the opportunity to upload his next story? And don't you dare tell me you haven't. I know what's going on with that right now.

- Every single one of you is guilty of being severly judgmental over individuals, not because of who they or any trouble they make, but because of the work they contribute to the archives. In fact, I don't even need to say this stuff! Just LOOK at the conversation that has been taking place amongst you! WolfenmausFor Christ's sake, it isn't even a spinoff. Just upload the thing so we can make fun of it, already. LOLSKELETONSThe only thing keeping me from deleting Sonic.exe is also a reason it would be better off not existing on here to begin with — its popularity. WednesdayMickey•puking•

.............................. THIS, is the way you guys are choosing to present yourselves. A bunch of spiteful, closed minded & arrogant people that give themselves a title they don't even deserve, especially after behaviour like this. - I'm sure you'll find the right proof for how you've reacted towards one of your own admins. How some of you have acted like you're still in grade school with the ways you tried to get a rise out of her. That's the act of a bully, not an admin. And if anyone here tried to justify it for even a second, there is something so wrong with you that you need to re-evaluate some things in your own life before you get a laugh out of making someone elses miserable.

Someone here has to be fair enough to consider what you've done, because in the end, NONE of you are clean from this matter. The fact that you've made a consensus about this kind of authority over an original creator & behaved the way you have towards someone such as FurBearingBrick is abysmal. Where the fuck does it stop after this, huh? Yes, I brought up that overused topic of argument. It's overued for a reason though; It's the truth.

Your intent is of a grown up, but your execution of these actions results in you looking like a bunch of 12 year olds. Please just take a look each other then sort yourselves out. I'm sorry, how long have you been here? How long have you had to go through horrible pasta after horrible pasta? How long have you had to critique the worst excuses of literature on the internet?

Sonic.exe deserves to be made fun of, no matter how you think otherwise. It's poorly written, has an awful plot, a plain idiotic protagonist, and is essentially wrong from every technical angle.

We may seem abusive and whatnot, but we have quality standards and we have them for a reason. If a pasta needs to be ridiculed, it will be ridiculed. It's the best way to weed out the bad or alerting how awful it is, and furthermore makes our jobs more enjoyable (i.e. less stressful).

If more people would learn how to write, this wouldn't be an issue. But people think they can just waltz into the internet and post whatever the hell they like and call it a pasta. That isn't how it works, and it's our job to keep that from happening any way we can.