Talk:The Rugrats Theory/@comment-7992038-20140509044848

Edgy for the sake of being edgy. Not setting out to make any form of statement. Not setting out to evoke any form of reaction out of the reader. Not even a story. Not even a theory. Theories have to be backed up by tangible evidence. I'm not implying the author is trying to convince us that this is all true because.....I dont think I need to explain that, but he or she could have at least made an effort to suspend our disbelief instead of "HURRR DUURRR ANGERICA IS A CRACK BABBY" Maybe I'm just overanalyzing something that's too shitty to be worth analyzing...yeah...probably that.