User blog comment:HyperMetalSniper/I don't understand anymore/@comment-27838637-20160711120659

I haven't read your stories, so unfortunately I can't give you any feedback in regards to that.

But I have read this blog post, and unfortunately (for you) I can give you some feedback on this argument you have presented.

I'll keep it short and sweet, because it seems that our good friend Ruckus has already done a very good job of pointing out the flaws present here.

Firstly, let me just say that the quality standards and blacklisted subjects exist to stop a massive influx of terrible stories. Even if you are a good writer (which you have made yourself out to be), you have to understand that not everybody is a good writer. So, would it be fair to allow the entire wikia to be overrun with terrible stories, just because the Quality Standards are ''unfair? ''I'm sure that there are sites like that; where no standards exist. I'm sure they aren't very popular.

This wikia is what it is, because those standards are in place. People come here to read quality stories. It is only proper that quality stories are allowed to be submitted (thus why they call them, Quality standards).

Secondly, the fact that you complained that Minecraft, Zelda and Pokemon stories are banned. Now, look at it this way (which is the only proper way to look at it). A video game is A SETTING. It is WHERE THE STORY TAKES PLACE.

Now, if you wrote a story that took place on 123 John Smith Street, that is THE SETTING of the story. Wouldn't it become repetitive if many stories were written on 123 John Smith Street? I'm sure that would lessen the quality of your own original setting and story. Also, there is only so much to write about on that one setting.

Thirdly, the deletion appeals and spinpasta appeals exist so that there is fairness on this site. There is a bit of leeway with what can be submitted, which wouldn't exist if this site didn't allow any freedom

Finally; I am a pretty average writer. I'm not the best at all. Yet, I have one story based on a killer set in a forest, published onto the wiki. My second story is in the writers workshop (you should probably check that out if you actually want your stories to be accepted), and it is soon going to be published onto the wiki. It is based on a killer too.

So you see, it's not so much what you write about, but how you write it. So that statement really renders your whole argument invalid, because  you have done nothing but complain about what you can't do, without telling us what you can do.

So, if I am only a pretty novice writer, and I can get my stories accepted onto the wiki - what does that make you?

The problem here is that you lack motivation, and you'd rather make excuses than make a difference. Instead of complaining that your story is not allowed onto the wiki - write one that is allowed onto the wiki. If you are actually a decent writer, you will  find it's not that hard. Take peoples advice, instead of thinking you are above them. Make a difference, instead of making excuses.

I don't know much about your writing skills, but I know that you lack the proper mentality it takes to be a writer. Maybe you need to give others a chance, then they might give you a chance.

A_O.