Talk:Subject C/@comment-5886533-20140621010155

I was thinking this was better than the first one until the end. Why would Subject C, the only one with the journal in possesion, write DO NOT OPEN on the book? And, if someone else DID find it, how would they have the time? That ending, "be warned", was a sorry attempt of enticing paranoia on the readers. It's been done a million time; not amused. Also, the dialogue of the man's journal was terrible. "I was right I was right...!" Really? And I doubt he'd kill his friend because he was "not wanting any trouble from the thing." An empathatic person would have SOME hesitation, unless if he was a psychopath. And, honestly, that would make a better story than this. 2/10