Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24486291-20140423033457/@comment-24077689-20140423200836

Fatal Disease wrote:

Princess Callie wrote: I think we should nuke the whole thing and make it soley an admin decision. Either that, or a select group of people who review them and vote. A committee, per say. I don't like the idea of administrators suggesting articles, per say. It would be quite a good idea, but some users may suggest articles that are qualitative - like myself with No One Lives Forever, and the current PotM suggestion Deathbed Table. How about we omit the users voting on stories, but rather have the following: Users suggest their articles that they aren't categorized as a Spinoff, or a trollpasta. And let the staff that edit on the site - VCROC, Admins, Bureaucrats - decide on who would be the winner. Rather than one story being recognized, have two to three stories nominated as a winner for that month. The downside of this is users complaining why their story didn't win, or why the old way has been thrown out. I can see my whole suggestion happening, kind of. I like this idea, but I also want to propose a middle ground. Why not have a committee set up? Like we have a bunch of active users that aren't in positions of power, that are intelligent enough to handle this well. Users suggest as you stated, but have the committee be a specific, specialized group of users.