Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4750363-20131023020818/@comment-24092184-20131104161711

LOLSKELETONS wrote:

41488p wrote:

Peppers246 wrote: I think this is a good idea, but it should be people who are not VCROC.

The admins and VCROC have enough to worry about, we should get a hand full of trustworthy people to form this team.

and who knows maybe the can be the next VCROC's and admins Agreed. Too much overlapping of roles isn't going to make things better. VCROC do VCROC stuff, admins do admin stuff, and reviewers do reviewer stuff. Admins (and maybe VCROC, but mostly admins) would be more-or-less the overseers. The idea is to get other trustworthy individuals together into a group that doesn't require you to edit constantly or any of that crap, but does require you to take on an active role in maintaining the wiki and have a good sense of what's "good" and what's "bad". At least, that's what I originally had in mind. Admins and VCROC as overseers are fairly good, but what if there's just too many

reviewers for the admins/VCROC to handle?