Board Thread:Site Policy/@comment-6296238-20130606233146/@comment-5643552-20130607062613

41488p wrote: Sloshedtrain wrote: LOLSKELETONS wrote:

Icecreamcaekbot wrote:

Sloshedtrain wrote: Almost oppose. I can see this only causing more problems. Sure, we more anti-vandalism tools then we have before, but some vandalism still go unnoticed and allowing anons will make vandalism rise no matter what. I serve the users and only the users of this wiki. Then again, I don't really know what could actually happen if we actually allow this, is it really hard for somebody to just make an account on Wikia. MediaWikis principle is to make databases that are editable to all. Some people only make a few edits and then leave, plus always assume good faith... if we lock this wiki down then we arent assuming good faith are we. Right. What would the point of making an account be if you only made a couple of edits? Plus, the assume good faith thing. I still feel we need to work on that. :I I feel like there's no need for anon editing. It takes like a minute to create a account. Just because users must create an account to edit doesn't mean the wiki is locked. Most of the pages, blogs, forums can be easily accessed or edited. Allowing anon editing only complicates what we already do. This.

THIS


 * D