User blog comment:EtherBot/Let's Talk Deletion!!!/@comment-25148755-20170210033945/@comment-24101790-20170210045843

How exactly???

"I feel like that also but that was sort of just the first idea I could think of when writing lol" Do you really want me to point out the issues here given the contextual response??? I can, but it seems like it'd be overkill.

"Anyway, like I said I don't really have any great ideas but I think it's weird how the immediant (sic) response is that "the system is perfect and cannot be improved and there's no hope or reason in even considering that at all let's me on now" when I notice some glaring issues sometimes. "I never said that, I just pointed out the necessity of authors putting in their own time as opposed to complaining..."'

"We're basically assigning quality control of every single story to ten people of course they're gonna screw up some times why is that a weird thing to say lol." '''It could happen, but we do have numerous users to keep us in lines as well as the other admins who operate as a separate checks and balances system. For example, take the story Banning marked for review, if we were a collective, wouldn't we have just deleted it outright? Why do we have the deletion appeal if we set ourselves up as a dictatorship? Maybe it just seems like the easier response to have when faced with criticism, but it's not exactly the most beneficial.