Talk:Journal Entries/@comment-5996595-20150416183239

has someone else heard the concept of "Chekhov's gun"? what i'm trying to say is that, it feels silly how it seems to say "this big-ass story is weird, mysterious and stuff, but it all might be fiction cuz not everything is fact-checked and all that has been told can just be sheer fiction, ya decide if you wasted your time". nothing really ties things together, sure there are connections between certain parts, but that's what they are, "connections". it could be improved if closure were offered in some cases, dig? the chinese ordeal, for example, the women in the family could have been rat breast-feeders, the hole in the crawlspace might have been haunted, the european people were scientist or something... just, remember: "CHEKHOV'S GUN" IS A THING

ps: i am aware of the irony that my review is long and i complain about lenghtyness, so don't bother pointing that out pss: i imagine the story might be like this for a reason that the community is not seeing, but so ain't i, so my oppinion is final 'til proven otherwise