Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-32757962-20170803192210/@comment-4107182-20180422105304

EmpyrealInvective wrote: Joe Thecreeper wrote: there were plenty of good scary stories that were taken down for the stupidest reasons. it doesn't matter. everyone liked creepypasta because it was a chance for them to share their own stories freely, now it's just like a stupid episode of america's next top model, with a bunch of stories being judged by bozos. That's a pretty flawed approach, just look at sites like Frightening Pasta Wiki that tried the no QS mindset. Tell me how active that site is nowadays and the people's activity on those wikias (commenting on stories, editing, etc.). Having no requirements tends to result in lazy writing that very few people will bother to read. you probably already know this but i created frightening pasta. the only reason why it doesn't have many users is because it hasn't gotten around much yet. it's been a long time since i updated that site. and i think the stories there are pretty good.

At least i'm not a judgemental goon who critques everything and takes perfectly good stories (like the ed edd n eddy purgatory theory or the my little poiny theory) down just because i personally don't think they're good enough -_-

that's the whole reason why i created frightening pasta in the first place. but thanks for reminding me about it though.

Creepy pasta is going to loose a lot of traffic due to these rules -_-