Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4832646-20140502023923/@comment-24841732-20140502040115

Devincooper64 wrote: Ecuinach wrote: Princess Callie wrote: Ecuinach wrote: wat. The only think Chao did was his fucking job. The entire time the only thing he "did" was tell Scorch that he needed to take it in PM. Also, this issue has already been closed. Scorch has been unbanned, and Chao retains his rights. End of story. Chao continues to be one of the best no-bullshit mods on chat. By attempting to demote him, you are only bringing up more issues that have already been resolved. Really now? As stated, Nick I agreed this should be created. And that explains the people who told Nick and I "He was constantly needing the last word, refused to drop the subject, and continued an argument after being asked to cease". That is not doing his job, by any stretch of the imagination.

Not to mention the history of offenses that should've gotten him demoted in the first place.

Mind naming these, please? As for the issue at hand, I was there the whole time. And while Scorch's testinomy is fairly accurate, he failed to mention that I warned him FIVE TIMES and kicked him TWICE before I had banned him. And while Chao agreeably should of stopped the argument himself, earlier, not once did he do something warrenting a demotion. ChaoZ did indeed try to squeeze out the last word every isntance he had, especially tried to make it prominent about the fact he called Scorch a "Fuck" just an FYI That line was uncalled for. However, the majority of the time he was telling Scorch to enter PM, which Scorch refused to do. Chao is responsible for his actions, yes, but a demotion is not nessasary, especially when it was Scorch's refusal to listen to several mods that allowed it to escallate.