Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4715590-20131031211355/@comment-5239282-20131108031127

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Necrosanity wrote:

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Necrosanity wrote:

Prince(ss) Platinum wrote:

Necrosanity wrote:

You all know this was coming from a mile away. Hopefully this is still a valid convo, though. I just love these lil revolts. ._.

On that note: I strongly the existence of this rule. ._.

If you haven't already, use your fucking brain -- chat is a fucking branch off of this wiki, and is therefore, in a sense, chained to this wiki. All the same rules regarding general conduct and content on this site should also apply -- and should not be fucking altered for the sake of consistency -- on chat. Someone with power can easily disable the chat feature, but the wiki will not fucking go anywhere unless staff says so. Which brings me to my next point: As mentioned before, we've a nice array of stories. It's not a necessarily quality library, but okay. I'd wager the majority of our library is saturated with at least some form of sexual content -- be it rape, teenage sex in the back of a pick-up, child molestation, and otherwise. It doesn't make sense on the name of consistency that sexual talk of all forms would be banned because it's evidently allowed in all shapes and forms on main. Think of it this way: anybody who hasn't contributed to main is dead weight in essence, and more than likely has no wish to do so, merely making a comment or two on Jeff is Back or Funnymouth -- some other mainstream pasta. They do not grasp the true intentions of this site, and probably never will. They think chat is all there is apart from popular pasta-hosting. They are dead fucking weight. And chances are, they, for whatever reason, have a sensitive enough asshole to be offended or disgusted by sex. We're conversely helping by deterring and thereby reducing the masses. And those who have a fucking pair? More power to us, as it equates to potential admins and mod to support the wiki -- maybe even tomorrow's next Slimebeast. That's what bugs me; this rule hampers the wiki in more ways than it helps it -- and not only by discouraging (un)wholesome entertainment. As it is, it's led to our most beloved users being banned and given admins and mods all the more power to abuse. ._.

Never mind natural selection, though; keep it fucking consistent with the wiki. ._.

I would probably have a slightly different point of view if chat was a stand-alone feature somewhere on the internet -- and if it was, half its userbase, including me, would've never came. But that isn't the case; whatever happens on our main, forums, and chat will fucking stay on this wiki. ._. We need to dump the stories involving rape/molestation btw.

It seems to me you're merely pulling and enforcing unjust actions out of your ass and onto the community to justify your cause, so convince me: Why? The fact that you close down, remove, and erase any post trying to rectify this law doesn't help, either. You also didn't cater to my other points. Please do. http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Community_Central:Community_Guidelines#The_Don'ts What I said is justified by global policy. Well, I can tell you that point is moot on a wide variety of standards. For one, some pages (especially considering the sheer volume of this wiki) on this site exploit the concept of religion and paint it evil, full of lies, and otherwise disgustingly filthy, so religious hate is automatically rendered pointless as universal law.

The rule in question, as far as I'm concerned, condemns all forms of sexual talk and can be, therefore, classified as strict, while Wikia disallows only the more explicit and grotesque content to outright pornography.

Oh, and "Don't pretend to be other people"? What is this, real life? 1) They are stories doing no harm to that particular group.

2) Content involving rape is strictly prohibited globally.

3) What about pretending?

1) In your eyes, that is. Perhaps there are some people who are genuinely offended as it targets the very thing they've slaved away at for perhaps the bulk of their life. There are too many what-ifs and purely hypothetical factors to argue that point.

2) Oh? Then what are stories such as Part of the 5.3% doing here? It involves desecration of dead bodies and can therefore be loosely defined as unwilling sex -- ergo, rape (not that corpses care). The NSFW category would've never been thought of if we seriously considered that rule. This also brings to mind another point: There's a chance (at least with the existence of that rule) this site would've been taken down a long time ago. This wiki, in effect, has grown apart and separated from Wikia as its own entity as not only is it self-sustaining for the most part, it doesn't heed by those boundaries set by Wikia.

3) We are all our own persona. We make ourselves out to be whoever we want -- we pretend. It's slightly different context, but it works. =p