Board Thread:Administration/@comment-8-20140408223349/@comment-5619531-20140408234524

I'm quite curious. This is just me throwing this out there, in a rhetorical statement to Guy's. I am curious if VSTF's can shut down a wiki? It's a stupid question, yes, but I am curious about it.

A while ago, I found a wiki by randomness trying to get to Community Central (since I was too lazy to type in Google, or whatever thing that consists of the hyperlinks.) As I did this in the main chat, and thinking that this would be a fake wiki, I typed in Booty in the main chat.

As I clicked the link, thinking it would take me to Community Central, it took me to an actual wiki where its topic was to post pictures of female buttocks. Sure, the wiki was dead itself, but one of the VSTF members, someone who started with a T and was a brony/pegasister, didn't really do nothing about the wiki except delete a picture from there. The picture was deleted... I say a month or so before I appeared.

Sure, it was a dead wiki (and there were hardly any pictures). But a regular user, like myself, doesn't have to go to the general contact in order to shut down a wiki, which the topic is against the TOU, when a VSTF had seen this wiki before I did, and not contacting the staff to shut it down.

How does this relate to this? It relates because it's not fair for a user like myself to do something that the VSTF should have done a long time ago when he/she visited the wikia. In this matter, yeah, calling someone the slur for a mentally handicapped person, or telling someone to go kill themselves, or anything downright derogatory is wrong. But taking it out on the user who decided to post it on his page, and providing the correct links to the user profiles within the quotes, is also wrong. It's playing the blame game on the person while the links for the users that said that kind of stuff are there in a link where a user can view their profile, and check the history of their edit.