Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24600153-20140419141550/@comment-5619531-20140419145732

エル・ローライト wrote: Fatal Disease wrote: エル・ローライト wrote: The reason I don't support demotion THREADS is because if you were to show proof/evidence to an admin in chat it would avoid much unneeded drama. Basically the vast majority of the demotion threads that were made towards users were given a valid reasoning as to why they weren't editing that well. They dicked around. Take MooseJuice, for an example. Everyone can agree with me on this if they were on last night. There was a spam-bot spamming there, and MooseJuice was the only one in the chat that had deletion powers. It took him a good 5-10 minutes for him to say "I gotz de spem bot!" or something similar, while Streve - who wasn't even in the chat until after the spam-bot was removed from the site - took care of all the pages, and blocked the user already. I don't control the administrator's lives outside of wikia, but this is part of laziness that should be a huge concern about.

If that's the case, which I too have witness. Maybe were not hiring the correct staff. Sure they're good, but no one is ever really ON. And when I say on I mean active and not just checking the chat every hour. Back in 2011 - 2012, he was fairly active. Nowadays, our rules have gotten strict on users who choose not to edit; playing around in the chat. You can announce an inactivity, and won't be subjected towards it. It would be treated as "Oh. Okay. You'll be inactive because of home and PC issues. Okay." But if it's something that isn't addressed, or some laziness, that would be a problem for most cases. This isn't Spinpasta wiki, where no one seems to not care anymore. This is a site where shit occurs, and it would be a value to aide the site.