User blog:OkSrsly/Come at me, bro.

Now. I'm not one for overly critiquing unnecessarily, and in no way am I perfect. If I believe something to be a good idea, creative, well thought out, a truly good attempt, then that's that. I will add my two cents in (always in my best attempts at courtesy.) However, I do have my minor pet peeves here and there. There are some famed pastas that I clearly must be missing the point of. I must honestly not be in on the joke. Some of these become so famed, you hear about them, run as quick as you can to go read the original...and find yourself blown away. Not by how well done they are, but the sheer fact that something so poorly written could have become such a cult-classic sensation, even on the interwebs. I get it. A vast majority of these readers tend to be kid. Pre-teens and younger, and there's no accounting for taste. I simply felt, at one time, that even the younger crowd could be respectfully choosy about what is and is not actually good literature. I suppose I am asking too much of a youth culture who's "refined" tastes believe Bieber and Cyrus are the new Elvis and Lauper. But fine. I'll take it. I simply remain weary of suggestion from this point on and into the future of perspective reading. Mkaaaiiiii.