Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24841494-20140309224529/@comment-24841494-20140310020910

Lemmy118 wrote: GraydonL wrote:

Lemmy118 wrote:

GraydonL wrote:

Lemmy118 wrote:

GraydonL wrote:

Lemmy118 wrote: I don't get it. What is the point of this? Isn't Trollpasta enough? Why do we want to display rejected pastas in yet another location? Also people are not going to take crappy stories serious enough to give a serious critique. Try looking through Trollpasta and see if anyone give any serious criticism. Partly for fun, and partly for critique. Some people have their stories deleted and actually want critique. Also, so this way users can not complain about their "masterpeices" being deleted. Also, there will be a PoTM type deal, and the winner will get reuploaded back on this site. People who got their pasta deleted can ask the admin who deleted their story for critique. :/ Most admins don't mind, it's just that people act all crazy when their stories are deleted. Also I don't think most people are happy when their stories are moved to Trollpasta wiki much less a website for rejected work. They may not be happy, but they will be a hell of a lot happier than when their work is deleted for "no reason". From what I've seen, it's about the same actually.

Exactly, so, would you rather be able to have your shit stain of a story be able to be critiqued, or would you rather it just fucking vanish with just a note saying "Deleted for quality standerds." Who gives a fuck if you hurt their feeling a bit by putting there story on a site for shitstains, where said said shitstain might just become a shitty smell, or even just a regular stain? If there story is bad, than too fucking bad. This way people can stop bitching about there awful story being deleted and be able to see what they fucking did wrong. Why is that so bad? You are missing the biggest point, people do not read shitty pastas on purpose just to give critique. People go to Trollpasta to have a laugh, not give critique. If people want to read pastas that needs improvement, they could just go to the "mark for review" category to give advice and how many people do you see read those on purpose just to help others out.

You're missing the biggest point. This is not Trollpasta, the point of the chaospasta wiki is to give critisim and encourgement to the stories that get deleted. Not all stories that are deleted are bad, you know. Most have one major flaw, such as too cliche, wall o texts, and bad spelling. Two of my stories were deleted from this site and none of them were "bad". This wiki is not just for laughable failures, it is also for those who tried and failed, and honestly want to get better. Which they can't BTW, if their story is deleted. For reference, one of my stories that was deleted: https://docs.google.com/a/k12.sd.us/document/d/10IFWVFrJbpGxLATxcPqrFfo5F8aQ-__cp_7K8uwizng/edit