Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-34423991-20180506163500/@comment-4665292-20180507171103

Not sure if I have one. There are a lot that I don't like or find creepy at all, but I haven't read all the stories here and never will read a lot of them because if I don't like how something starts, I usually stop reading. My least favourite thing about this wiki are the 12-year-old commenters who insist that everything is real, though...

Anyway, I guess literally any game pasta could be my least favourite. There's a lot of potential in the concept of game-related horror, but it's never pulled off well enough in my opinion. Like, in my opinion many more lines would have to be crossed for a "cursed game" story to be as effective as a "cursed video" story. All the ones I've read have been more or less "wow guise, a non-horror game turned into a horror game... wat do?" or something.

As for Normal Porn for Normal People, I like it; it doesn't rely on the shock value of goreporn and actually has a creepy atmosphere to it. (I wonder if the title is a subtle reference to the novel High Life by Matthew Stokoe, in which all kinds of violent sexual stuff happens and a (legit normal) place is described as a "normal place for normal people". Probably not, but when I was reading said novel it made me chuckle because I was reminded of Normal Porn for Normal People (which the novel has certain similarities to, too).)

It seems absurd to me that the passing mention to the chimp being injured was removed considering the rest of the content, but I suppose that makes sense to whoever came up with the rules.