Board Thread:Site Policy/@comment-4750363-20130703214523/@comment-4099220-20130704040512

98.253.111.186 wrote: ClericofMadness wrote: Golly gee, I'm sure going to take stock in what an anonymous poster has to say, because they are too afraid to have an account to do so.

...Afraid to have an account? For your sake, I'm going to hope that you're just butthurt and trying to flame and sucking at it; it would be tragic if you're actually serious because your position is really, really fucking stupid as well as unspeakably arrogant.

But since you don't care enough to actually bother to explain more about how I am supposedly wrong -instead wasting valuable time posting horrific exaggerations to your almost cult-like chatgoers so you can feel good and clever- I won't bother. It's a bit of shame because you could have looked less of a bloo-blooing manchild that way, especially since it's obvious you're wounded by the way I challenge your negligence of the site upon crap pretenses instead of me simply not having an account.

And how cute; you say I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOUR OPINION and then turn around and explain about your "suffering" because of it, ignoring that if you're so exhausted by it, you should just openly state such, move on for a bit and appoint a successor. Unless you're tacitly admitting that the site you run is so relentlessly shitty that you can't even do that. First of all; while relatively well-versed... this is exactly the reason we don't allow anon editing. Seriously, dude. You want to try to start shit; make an account. Anonymity will get you nowhere, here. Second; why the hell did you have to go and attack Cleric's character, huh? Not called for and it's a baaaaddd way to conduct an argument. No one's gonna take what you have to say seriously.