Talk:Lost Episodes/@comment-26054278-20150221225325/@comment-1216259-20150505201042

"Yes, the material he intentionally made dark and twisted."

Even then, they weren't back-to-back horrific imagery from start to finish.

"No, because he addressed the continuity and relevance to the other Lost Episodes in the first sentence."

What I am saying is that, within the context of Sid's world, all other origins for lost episodes are simply false. It pretty much seems to be written for people who don't actually like the genre, & therefore wouldn't mind seeing it reinterpreted.

"Also, this pasta would have been way more interesting if it was actually in Sid's head."

I don't really see how that would work, but then again, I never was much of a horror writer.

"And I hate the sequel more than I hate this pasta."

I can understand that, I thought "Sid's Video" wasn't as good as "Lost Episodes," but the point remains that there is a contextual reason for why the power still works. It may as well be "magic," but there aren't a lot of realistic creepypasta anyway.

"Jeff the Killer, Squidward's Suicide, Dead Bart, Eyeless Jack, Laughing Jack, and Sonic.exe were all popular stories that a lot of people liked/loved."

I deliberately avoided most of that, so I wouldn't know, but it seems to me that Jeff the Killer is disliked by most people outside of the preteen demographic. But yes, popularity doesn't automatically equate to popularity either.

Are you implying that Eyeless Jack is bad?

"The originality was the one point that I'm pretty sure I acknowledged in my review. And while it is well-written, I don't feel the writing matches the story. Really, it comes down to personal preference. I dislike it quite a bit, you don't. Simple as that."

Okay, sure, but I maintain that it's internally consistent.