Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4750363-20131023020818/@comment-14341590-20131102162215

WhyAmIReadingThis wrote: So, I suppose that we all know what a literature wikia's biggest harm is.

Content of bad quality.

We Administrators and VCROC patrol the place, keeping our eyes open to lower the input of bad stories. However, there is a part that we, no matter the reason, seems to have left more or less behind.

Old stories.

So, Skeletons and I were talking, and an idea was formed.

Basically, the intention would be to form a team of Reviewers. People (possibly only VCROC and Admins, up to be discussed if the general public could) mark stories with the Flagged for Deletion template. However, instead of a poll being set around, the procedure would be different!

The Reviewers would vote in the comment section of the story. Then based on the result of their votes, the story stays, or gets deleted.

The team would be formed by semi-active members, people who log in this place at least once a day, max once every two days.

So opinions? Do you people think it could work? Anything to point, or contribute?

This is a good idea, and I for one would love to write several reviews for CreepyPastas. Although, I think we should make it fair by letting those who don't speak out (to have a chance at writing reviews too) - just to make it fair, thats all I'm saying :)