Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4750363-20131023020818/@comment-5619531-20131023181451

CrashingCymbal wrote: I agree that this process sounds quite difficult, but I believe with the users we have it can be done. What this Wiki really needs right now is more VCROC.

What we would need, if you ask me, would be a select amount of users to monitor newer stories coming in at certain times in the day based on when users are active and when they're not. Then we would need, I would imagine, a bigger group of people to sieve through the categories for all the crappy stories we have here which, let's be honest, the majority are in the Video Games, Lost Episodes and Computers and Internet categories. We also have the problem of the Death category, which would a monstrous amount of time to flick through.

Having said that, my idea sounds like it risks taking weeks or even months of hard work to do, so if anyone has any other suggestions that could shorten the length of time, please throw it out there! I do like what Cymbal just said. I like it a lot. Also, in one of the threads Skelly highlighted, is that some of the categories should just be cleaned out. Ka-poot on this wiki. Death, for example. But, like I did when Trollpasta was cleaning out  unneeded categories, is that we should have anyone, who will volunteer for this, clean up the categories. Or even better, just have what LOLZIES and Nick just plotted down for a rough draft (the reviewer) and have a project page about what type of duties they are supposed to do today. Have a team based on 10-20 user's, who will volunteer for this. Have a specific guideline, on what is the objective. If it's cleaning out a category, the objective should say "Clean out Death category." Why, they don't have to be VCROC members to do this. They can just remove the category, from an unprotected page, and leave the unattended pages (which are the protected pages) left untouched, for VCROC/admin members. Also, to avoid editing conflicts, every member, who volunteered, should get like a specific amount of pages. If the category has, ex, 60 pages. If it's 10 user's, 6 pages per user. If it's 20, 3 pages per user. Then the user, who's up, must go on the activity talk page, and say "done". Then the next user can go, till the task is finished. Then the admin would delete the comments, and go on. If it's a page, that's marked for deletion or needs editing. M4D pages, like it says. The poll. If it's a M4R/NE page, then the users (regular) can go and edit that page. If they're uncertain, that is, they can let an admin/VCROC look at the page, read it. Then remove the tag/category. That is my idea on what the Review Team should be. If enough people don't volunteer, then whoever is currently volunteering, is what makes up the team. If my idea does get passed, then we should start the volunteering at the beginning of November. If we reach the guideline of 10-20 people at the end of the month. That's a good thing. If not, then keep the thing open till Janurary. If the volunteers is not complete, then that'll be the whole basis of the team.