Talk:One Single Instant/@comment-25458443-20140929051109

Before commenting please note the specific design choices.

-The story opens describing why the speed of light is impossible to pass. Right before telling us why it is possible to pass the speed of light. This is the first example of having to defy something you previously thought to be true.

-He states multiple facts of exposition, including.

1)The fact that he cannot die

2)The fact that he is the only thing that can move. and

3)The fact that he has tried to kill himself but failed everytime. (Even noting killing another man to contrast)

-This is all before making you

1)Question if he can die.

2)Question if anyone else moves.

3)Question if he has failed because of the Loop, or because he just sucks.   (The second instance of makng you rethink what you know)

-We introduce a moving blob that you know is not real, because nothing moves and he's been alone for "god knows how long". It makes sense for his mind to imagine something. But then he is tripped by this Who'sawhat'sit and collapses. Right before making you think he my (Or my not,) have just tripped. (The third instance of making you rethink what you know.)

This story obviously has a strong sense of science. And scientists have to rethink what they know a lot. The horror concept came from wondering what you would do if every just stopped moving one day for no reason, and then once you get used to that, ''one thing begins to move. ''I thought of this as a phsycology question and mixed it with admitting your wrong later in my head. Before writing a story about all three. (Including phsycology).