Board Thread:Administration/@comment-10950063-20140721211610/@comment-10950063-20140721224715

EmpyrealInvective wrote: I heard that some people call it an "amen corner"

Shit!

Jokes aside I do believe in some instances it can bring the point home. For example, if someone posts a blog complaining about how their pasta James the Murderer was totally not a carbon-copy of JtK ("He says 'Go take a nap!' Totally different.) and should have not been deleted, having multiple people opining on the contrary might drive the point home as opposed to one admin who they might consider as being biased. Sometimes, yeah, but in the proper situations. If someone is adamant that they're in the right, more people can join in. This person hasn't even responded and there have been three admins adding onto what I first said. You just added another response that doesn't say anything new. Sure, you cited some long stories, but it's already been established that there's no problem with long stories.

This is what I'm talking about. Yeah, this person acted kind of like an asshole. I set them straight. If another person got there first, they would've set them straight. They don't need FOUR people setting them straight by telling them the same things. Not only is it a dick move, but it completely diminishes the effect of any of them.

Here's the thing: if this person had asked a question and someone answered it, would the rest of you jump in and answer it again? I doubt it, because I haven't seen that. Not from admins, at least.

But here we are scolding someone and EVERYONE WANTS TO JUMP IN. How does that look?