Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-9340689-20150930023544/@comment-24101790-20150930120419

"Whitix's message was simply the most recent example (and I actually meant to remove that link, but forgot). I was mostly referring to creepypastas that were fine, except the simply forgot to press "enter" enough times to separate the paragraphs, which, while tedious and annoying, would be simple to do."

The original story didn't have that formatting issue when Jay deleted it. It was only when they posted it to the WW that they had the issue and since reviewers tend to not review a story that is a wall of text, Jay corrected it so they could receive more specific feedback about issues.

"Also, 'do your research' you say to a person who clearly took the time to collect evidence to support her claims?"

I'm not seeing much time put into researching any of those claims. Like Kris Straub popping onto the wiki to revert someone's edits to intentional grammar mis-use? The story wasn't originally posted by the author and like many classics, it originated offsite and was posted by a user who wanted the story to get more recognition. Looking over the revision history, that's pretty apparent so my claim of you not doing any research really does seem more likely.

So in conclusion.