Board Thread:Chat Discussion/@comment-5590118-20141120182446/@comment-10319977-20141210003154

William See wrote: The fact that you refuse to see the fact that NOBODY was harrassing anyone, essentially accusing admin or favoritism even thought that in itself is frowned upon, and generally being dickish (calling people childish, "trendy internet term", etcetera,) more or les proves what everyone saw tonight in chat.

I will however, own up that I said leave if you don't like chat, but that's simply because we get this from so many users complaining about issues that started with them it's hard not to treat this response the same.

You didn't cause drama, you caused flame bait. When you flame bait, you continually pursue a topic or person in order to ellicit responses. If you DON'T agree with the ruling that you continue to cause problems, then there is simply nothing we can do. We are not "nepotists", nor do we condone it or abusive users. And for the last time, nobody harassed anyone. Your point is about as valid as you getting mad at someone for calling another person what they are, which I throw around casually and in a joking manner. Your first paragraph basically says "I'm right because I'm right." and that circular reasoning proves no fault on my part. I didn't call anyone "childish", and I called white knighting a trendy internet term because that's quite literally what it is. I'd like to quickly point out the hypocrisy in you complaining about this, seeing as how in your final paragraph you point out how ridiculous it is for someone to "get mad at someone for calling another person what they are", which is essentially what you're doing now.

Secondly, I don't actually think it was you who told me to leave. I'm pretty sure I saw another user tell me to leave, hence part of why I said you were ganging up on me. If you told me to leave as well, then that's even worse, regardless of your excuses.

According to your logic, anyone who speaks is technically "flame baiting" because they're persuing a topic to get a response. That's what talking is.

I don't disagree with the rules. I never said I did. In fact it's quite the contrary. I wish they were enforced. I recommend that you stop using straw man arguments.

Lastly, if it really was "a joke" then you should have no problem apologizing. It's not like I know you or knew you were joking. At this point it just seems to me like you "joking" is a cop-out for you breaking the rules.

Whether you apologize or not is up to you. I'm going to log off the site for a bit. Who knows how long it'll be 'til I come back on here. It could be a day or a year. Either way, I was never interested in engaging in the drama this site has to offer, but I did my best to point out who I've seen cause it and give a bit of advice on how I think it could be fixed.

Good day.