Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24841494-20140413162532/@comment-5619531-20140413170102

WiIlow wrote: Fatal Disease wrote: The elaboration of this, first time: two weeks, second time: ten days, third time: three weeks, just actually made me say "wot" out loud.

Although I do like a temporal shut-down of the chat for ten days, though. Fatal, those aren't how long it's going to be shut down for at different times, those are how long it COULD be shut down for if this goes through. To me, ten days seems reasonable. Shouldn't really be escalating back and forth though, that's what Graydon did. The reason as to why people are voting oppose is because people are unclear, like I was. Because here was what Graydon did: First time that we offer a chat shut down we close it for three weeks. Second time that we offer a chat shut down we close it for ten days. Third time that we offer a chat shut down we close it for two weeks. That's why. It goes off-balanced towards the times. Towards my opinion, if shit decides to go off-balanced (meaning that the site needs cleaning, and drama is leaking from the chat onto the site) then someone from the administration team, who realizes this, should make a thread proposing another chat shut-down.

Or, another one of my options, is that we have a temporal shut-down every one to two months for a short temporal time of ten days. Then we reboot the stuff.

Either or would work. Both, in my eyes, would be a perfect restart button for this wiki.