Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-25291276-20140813164111

So I've been wondering something : let's say you are a person that enjoys reading creepypastas, you've been reviewing them for some time now and people tend to refer to you as a good critic/reviewer. Suddenly, an idea pops up in your head!

Shoud you or should you not, write your own creepypasta?

Well, this is a subject open for debate, of course, so here's what I think, as an avid creepypasta reader :

I do believe that, yes, if someones thouroughly enjoys deconstructing stories, they would in fact be quite agile when it comes to constructing one.

Of course one can be a very good critique and still not be a good writer. In that case it's simply about preferences. You do what you want.(duh)

I'd say one should always do like always, deconstruct the story. In the case of writing or reviewing, being able to see the different sections of a story is the critical point to writing a decent story. of course, then comes execution. How well can you actually convey what you want to write? Well with all the knowledge one acquires with reviewing stories, surely one can write a decent paragraph.

I'd like to know what you guys think and perhaps know the point of view of someone who writes these stories. 