Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24841494-20140413162532/@comment-5239282-20140413233849

Fatal Disease wrote: Option A: We leave the chat on, and let the moderators do their job - since moderators are supposed to moderate, right? We re-write the entire chat rules, providing how long the user should be banned for what they have done and if they repeat an offence (that way, we don't have user's complaining about how their ban is unjust). We also add in the rules that if anyone brings any sort of drama onto the main site they will get banned from the chat for (depending on how much drama that it has caused): This means threads about a rule that they think is unjust (like the banning of the word cunt and how it was unjust). Also, since the mods do not know on what they're doing with their jobs, we add a section in the rules that mods should not be afraid of losing their job because they're doing their job that there should be no consequences to doing their jobs. And we also omit arguments that moderators have cause, because mods who join in on the users arguing/the ones who cause the drama is highly unacceptable. And we omit mods being biased towards users. "I can't ban him for saying fa****, because he's my best friend!", "I can't ban her for linking porn, because she's my girlfriend!" "I don't want to ban her for sockpuppeting, because her ban was unjust!" And we have mods follow the site rules, like this Haven't we done this before? It doesn't seem to work.