Board Thread:Applications/@comment-5052692-20130803122103/@comment-4715590-20130804054818

Temmington wrote: Critic of Sadness wrote: Temmington wrote: Critic of Sadness wrote: Temmington wrote: Critic of Sadness wrote: Temmington wrote: Critic of Sadness wrote: CrashingCymbal wrote: Has proved themselves to be really helpful and useful on this site (especially over the last week) and I feel would make a wonderful contribution to Sysop. (using Crashing's post for revelance) If what your saying is that she has put in alot of effort in the last week, I think she needs to keep pushing to even a month. I don't really know, as I have no place in keeping track in edits, but lots of admins had to show alot of effort, not just a mere week of hard work. This is like working at a job, you work very hard for a week. You don't get a auto promotion, you have to wait a long time for your hard work to be noticed by your superiors. To me, like I have said before, there is almost 10 active staff that edit, not including mods. Even with that, that is alot of staff editing. Like I said, I'm not 100% sure, but I think they almost edit every single day. I have been editing long before last week, I just took a hiatus and came back recently. Meh, I think you should show more dedication, even going for a month would be okay, I don't think everyone should be thinking about making you a mod even after you just said you came back from a Hiatus. Maria told me I should apply once I got 1,000 edits. That's like saying NeveR should apply once he gets 1000 edits. Plusing that, he's only been here for three months and you've been here for a year. There's a difference between saying a genuine candidate should apply once they reach ___ edits and just a random person. Are you saying that a random person with alot of edits wouldn't count or you have to be a vet to be an admin and have a large amount of edits? I'm kinda confused with the qualifications of being an Admin and I have went through the people who have supported you and about 3 should even make the cut, IMO, people with fewer contributions to the wikia lower than 20 edits or just joined a few days ago. I'm not saying they are not worthy of an opinion, I'm just saying that they should get more involved and see the effects of what they are supporting. Why are you so against this? People have their opinions and you seem to just be trying to change them. If we're going to just have restrictions, might as well having voting be admin only. .-. How can they have an opinion if they haven't even been involved for a week?