Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-5590118-20140921233707/@comment-5590118-20140922000243

CassistRabbit wrote: Shining-Armor wrote: It isn't too much to manage. Encyclopedic articles are easier to monitor and write as they are purely based on citable facts. As it stands a project like this could very well attract more editors who would be interested in such a project. I suppose that's reasonable, but how many editors would be interested in such a project? I'm only one, but I don't have much inetrest in it. I'm fine with editing articles.

At the moment we do not know. As this project has only just recently been proposed there hasn't been a whole lot of attention drawn to it. If successfully created however I am one of the interested users.