Talk:All Too Human/@comment-34753988-20180219224331/@comment-10502460-20180306082326

Hello, I just joined the wiki so I could tell everyone how much this story clashes with my worldview with that being my main reason for rating it as a bad story. Please listen to me as I state proven concepts of science and intersplice them with my own subjective and fallible opinions on matters of interpretive speculation without any disclaimers or language to indicate which is which, in hopes that you will not be able to tell. Read along as I continue to nonchalantly opine on questions such as the very nature of consciousness and humanity itself as if they have been empirically resolved, when in fact that is categorically not the case. You would think having the answers to such questions that humans have been asking since, well, since we've been around, would prompt me to write a book and try to get some recognition for solving the Great Existential Dilemma, but instead I chose to relate it in the form of a creepypasta review. Now listen as I outline what I believe a sapient AI would be like without giving any reason why my prediction is more valid than this story's vision, and then watch as I completely contradict myself by saying we really don't know the answers to any of this after I just spent a bunch of paragraphs detailing why I know for a fact that conscious AI could not pan out the way it does in this story.