Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-27905100-20170123054947/@comment-25947144-20170123114030

There's one essential thing I forgot. You can't be racist against Muslims and Mexicans. Neither is a race. Muslim are part of a religion, and a regressive one at that. Not all Muslims are Arabs and not all Arabs are Muslim. Mexican is a nationality. Same deal, not all Latinos are Mexicans and vice versa.

ISIS are not "a bunch of idiots stuck in the desert." Islam is a religion that exists all around the world and extremists also do exist all over the world. That's part of the reason why you can't simply bomb them all, the other is that they often take hostages. Don't get me started on the poor Yazidis. In my opinion Islam is a religion, no, an ideology that should be either severely modified or destroyed. Because even when the extremists aren't terrorists, there are not terrorist, there are places like Saudi Arabia. And don't get me started on how many crimes the refugees are committing.

You seem unusually aggressive towards me in the abortion signal. I'm sure people who commit mass genocide don't care about my opinion on their right to do that. That doesn't mean the two are comparable, just that the statement was useless. I said I'm mostly against abortion. I'm not a fucking monster, I think it's justified when, for example, a women gets a rape pregnancy, if the child has serious medical problems that will impact it's life, if the mother's life is threatened and even in just accidental pregnancies, in the first few weeks (but not multiple times). Though I'd be much happier if people would just be more responsible so the last case doesn't happen that often.

First, white people are shot in a higher number, but yes, black people are disproportionally more likely to get shot. They also account for a disproportional amount of crimes. Despite being about 16% of US population, they account for 50% of all murders. Also, unarmed doesn't automatically mean they weren't dangerous. If a guy twice your size would charge at you, would you go for hand-hand combat? No, you'd shoot him. That's a fight you can't win.

That's a guilt-tripping tactic. "Oh, think of the children!" Policemen find themselves on a regular basis face to face to cold-blooded criminals that won't hesitate to shoot you. If you would find yourself in that situation, would you risk being shot on the possibility that the gun is fake?

For the Wall part, read the first paragraph.

What is so bad about nationalism? Anyway, don't you think I want such a world? Don't you think I'd like to live in a united world with people holding their hands and singing Kumbaya while fucking unicorns that shit rainbows fly above us? Of course I'd do. But this is the real world. A world full of greedy people who want the world for themselves and abuse your trust the moment you hand it to them. People like globalists, who on the surface want what you're describing, but in reality want the world united under their elite. That's partly why Brexit happened. In the European Union your state doesn't matter, our collective matters.

I think that you're wrong and write at the same time about the voting part. People like you, willingly or not, made the general consensus: Trump supporters are stupid, Trump supporters are racists, sexists, homophobes and everything that's bad with that's wrong with the world. You won't change their opinions by constantly insulting them. That pushed Trump supporter, and even neutrals, who wouldn't normally vote towards voting Trump out of spite. If you don't believe this, a big portion of Trump voters voted in the previous years Obama. Do you think those who voted Obama are racist, sexists, homophobes? And don't even get me started on Hillary and the far left.