User blog comment:Banningk1979/Writer's Lounge Part 4: An Interview with EmpyrealInvective/@comment-5632489-20141201235846/@comment-24101790-20141202221731

So I have a proposal to make. (Doesn't sound awkward at all.)

As the writer's workshop has been looking rather quiet lately as mentioned by some astute users. I want to try and help a little, but as I am typically occupied with Spinoff Appeal, Deletion Appeal, and the false positive report I don't really have much time to contribute there. So a proposition is in order.

Cumulatively if you guys (or anyone you can convince to help) reviews five stories on WW, I will post the three best (ridiculously bad) pages from my story in a pastebin link. As I don't want to clog up this blog with links/urls to stories on the WW you guys have reviewed, they should be posted on my talk. The pages will be left in their horrifyingly inept glory (with some minor redactions to conceal personal information)

If in total, you review 10 altogether this month, I will break up the pages so they are legible and include some minor commentary pointing out the ridiculousness/terribleness.

If a grand total of 15 is reached this Dec., I will go full out MS3K on a section and completely destroy childhood Travis' hard work. How does that sound, doing a little work on the wiki to reveal something so shameful the author keeps it hidden away?