Board Thread:Administration/@comment-4832646-20140318213355/@comment-4832646-20140319154242

Scorch933 wrote: WhyAmIReadingThis wrote: Reminder: the purpose isn't to force people to edit. If you don't want to edit, so be it! So what is the purpose, Nick? To bitch? To encourage editing? True, you will get a few chat regulars to edit, but Let me ask a question. How many users, of 20,000, regularly visit the chat? No more than a hundred or so. I could be wrong. Estimate off the top of my head. Who are you encouraging to edit by disabling the chat? The couple dozen who don't edit and probably won't during this time- OR, the people who have already volunteered to edit WHO COULD BE EDITING BUT DON'T.

@Callie: Then get rid of chat. There's no point in having Chat Moderators that don't even do their jobs if they are going to be forced to edit. With Rollback and VCROC, those are for people who have edited and contributed to the site. It's really a title though. A chat moderator serves the purpose of moderating chat a certain number of hours each day. If that duty is skewed by the obligation to edit, They should not be "chat moderators". In fact, there shouldn't be a chat if the focus of a Chat Moderator's job is to edit. Because then he's not a chat moderator. If the right is effectively useless on the site, why do they need to have an edit count if their job is to moderate? YOU SEEM TO BE MISSING THE POINT. Again, you're missing the point. Chat is part of the site. And if chat is so little a distraction as you claim, want-to-be mods should have no problem fufilling the prerequisites.