Board Thread:Applications/@comment-5052692-20130803122103/@comment-5052692-20130804053317

Critic of Sadness wrote: Temmington wrote: Critic of Sadness wrote: Temmington wrote: Critic of Sadness wrote: CrashingCymbal wrote: Has proved themselves to be really helpful and useful on this site (especially over the last week) and I feel would make a wonderful contribution to Sysop. (using Crashing's post for revelance) If what your saying is that she has put in alot of effort in the last week, I think she needs to keep pushing to even a month. I don't really know, as I have no place in keeping track in edits, but lots of admins had to show alot of effort, not just a mere week of hard work. This is like working at a job, you work very hard for a week. You don't get a auto promotion, you have to wait a long time for your hard work to be noticed by your superiors. To me, like I have said before, there is almost 10 active staff that edit, not including mods. Even with that, that is alot of staff editing. Like I said, I'm not 100% sure, but I think they almost edit every single day. I have been editing long before last week, I just took a hiatus and came back recently. Meh, I think you should show more dedication, even going for a month would be okay, I don't think everyone should be thinking about making you a mod even after you just said you came back from a Hiatus. Maria told me I should apply once I got 1,000 edits. That's like saying NeveR should apply once he gets 1000 edits. Plusing that, he's only been here for three months and you've been here for a year. There's a difference between saying a genuine candidate should apply once they reach ___ edits and just a random person.