Board Thread:Site Policy/@comment-4750363-20130703214523/@comment-4750363-20130703231550

CrashingCymbal wrote:

Now, I know that SOME contributers have been good and fixed articles with HONEST intentions, but I have seen admins have to edit Anon's talk pages to warn them of bad edits several times, and have had to edit other pages to coincide with the new Anon rule. (Example, on the Pasta and Image of the Month Nomination Page, they had to edit it to "No Anonymous Nominations) I would like to point that the new "No Anonymous Nominations" is mostly to fill a loophole. You know, to avoid an user from nominating a pasta he/she created, making the nomination through anonymous editing.