Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-25291276-20140813164111/@comment-25291276-20140813172129

I may have been unclear in my explanation :

when I said that "one can be a very good critique and still not be a good writer", I meant as in having the will and, pardon me if this sounds silly, "natural capacity" of writing good stories(as in, ideas and execution).

And I believe, I see your point Mystreve, of course while (I believe) some people do have that "natural capacity", learning is a big part of the process. But in the other hand, reviewing stories is basically learning, then teaching what to do and what not to do, is it not?

Then of course, someone who writes a story, should be looking forward to criticism, writers and reviewer-turned-writer alike.