Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24011918-20131214001227/@comment-5946174-20131217001443

CalasanX wrote: But, if we're going to say that we'll allow something to be called retard, why not allow some one as well? https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope

Necrosanity: Well said.

Noothgrush: Why agree with Necrosanity but disagree with me when that's pretty much what I've been saying all along? To me, neither "faggot" nor "retard" are offensive, but if I had to choose, I'd say the former is more so, considering that the words "gay" and "faggot" still mean what they originally meant.