Board Thread:Administration/@comment-24841494-20140304215157/@comment-24841494-20140304221848

Princess Callie wrote: GraydonL wrote: Example of guidelines for micropasta: If it has no plot, that may still be a valid story. If it is longer than 200 words, then it is NOT a micropasta. If it repeats a word more than twice, when it is not being used for repetition, then it is NOT a valid pasta. If it has bad descriptions, that is NOT a valid pasta. A micropasta relies on descriptive, powerful words to convey as much meaning with as little writing as possible. Standard quality control still applies. The last thing many of us want to do is count the words to determine whether it's acceptable or not. Okay, I under stand that. Maybe it could be judged another way. That is why it is an EXAMPLE, not final. Also, do you support or oppose this?