Talk:The Rugrats Theory/@comment-24368802-20140103001836/@comment-24390275-20140108053144

"The theory itself is creepy. It doesn't have to be scary, just creepy." It's actually not creepy/scary at all, and nowhere did that person say it was or wasn't scary, so I'm not sure where you got that, or how it's in any way relevant.

"Also, this isn't one of those science black holes theories. It's a show theory. No science involved. -_____-" Tenthen didn't say it was for certain a scientific theory (and it's not), they mentioned there wasn't anything backing it up, too. But since you wanted to portray it as matter of scientific vs non scientific theory, well...

For it to be a non-scientific theory, it would explain something about the show. But what does it really explain? The things the author uses as the basis/examples for such could easily be switched out with anything.

"Everyone is a figment of imagination, etc etc" is not an explanation for Rugrats, it's a cop-out. There's nothing, as IStoleThePies mentioned, backing anything here up. It's really just utterly baseless fanfiction bullshittery.

"Most creepypastas are fake. Just because something's fake, doesn't mean it's not good. You like movies and video games, don't you?" What. His/her point is that it's not believable/doesn't causes immersion in the slightest. You have laughable reading comprehension.

"Not all "theories" are science related. Don't have to be either." See above point.

"These things never happened its a creepypasta for god's sake nothing is real on this site its not suppose to be logical or have explanations thats the whole point." It's obvious that they mean "happening in them" as in "this is what we're expected to go along with". It's not like you need a crystal ball for this stuff, bad as their post may have been. Also, it's supposed to be a theory, right? So yes, it has to be both logical and have explanations (well, technically the theory would be the explanation). Otherwise, what's the point?

Imagine if I wrote a "theory" about how, say, Veggietales was secretly a Satanic plot to take control of the minds of our youth. Would it be believable? No. Common sense (which seems to be increasingly less common) would cement it as Tinfoil Hat Territory or for laughs before it got off the ground. Yet this, along with practically every one of if not all of the "Theory" pastas somehow get off just fine, apparently. Are you sure you're so far away from becoming an Infowars poster?

"Also keep your rude comments to yourself you're entitled to your opinion and I understand you dont like it but still..." I would advise the same, but I also think you should keep your worthless, ill-informed comments to yourself. You, also, have laughable reading comprehension.

...You know, I'm tempted to agree with Tenthen about this being WMG quality writing. Better write about how everyone was really Haruhi Suzumiya who was also a Time Lord next! That'll scare the pants off some cretin.