Board Thread:Administration/@comment-24376429-20140226203353/@comment-1196539-20140303175043

CreepyStoriesRUs wrote: Xelrog T. Apocalypse wrote: CreepyStoriesRUs wrote: You accuse me of making a hypocritical post? It is not bad grammar because you hate my opinion, please do explain what is bad grammar and report to me if you so choose. CreepyStoriesRUs wrote:

Neutral because [no "of"] I am against [add "it"] for poor wording and for it if you have the powers or help from others of high ranks. Done.

Even after that, your statement doesn't make a lick of sense, though. All I can gather from your argument is "I don't know this Rarity person and if I don't know her she must be some new hot-shot staff member making up rules just to puff up her own ego." Which is beyond ridiculous as an argument and completely not true. Does that mean I have terrible grammar? No, it either means you don't understand the quality of the words I chose or you just want reason to argue. Bad grammar is different from just understanding. No one used the word "terrible." And you seem to have conveniently ignored the example I gave you and what's more completely missed the point of my post. If someone doesn't understand your argument, you don't say "you're stupid" and walk off; you elaborate. Explain to me if I have your argument correct, and if I don't, what I have wrong. I explained to you rather concisely what I understood of your post.