Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-5619531-20140922142049/@comment-5619531-20140922202820

Mystreve wrote: I didn't vote for the JtK thread as i am neutral on it. It's an abysmally-crafted story, yes, but it did generate a lot of traffic for the site. Hence me feeling like a vote from me wouldn't have really mattered anyway. Some are upset about it, others not. It is what it is, in my mind.

Anyway, back to your OP. I didn't really follow any drama between Cleric and Callie that occured. I do know that Callie started that thread, and saw that the people who voted "support" were pretty overwhelming. Cleric also mentioned on that thread that it should be moved to one of our sister sites. It was (SPW).

I guess what I'm getting at here is it looks as if things were communicated appropriately, via that thread and the community spoke and got their wish. This seems like more of a personal vendetta against the admin team, Fatal. We do our best around here, and for you to come around complaining that things aren't perfect all the time seems silly. Unless I'm interpreting your post wrong? You're interpreting the thread wrong. It's not a personal vendetta against the admin team. And it's definitely not me complaining either. If I wanted to complain, I do know what should be a thread and what should be a blog. I know that you guys try to do the best for this site by any means necessary, and I'm not the only one that gives thanks for you guys and your hard work. But there has been a lack of communication from the admin team here other than proposals. Sure there have been some situations where a few admins get together and work, but from what I see most of the time is people who do what they want when they want. We have talk pages and the chat for communaction (why, but there hasn't been an admin meeting noticing stuff like this since we decided to remove Sonic.exe, if I remember correctly.

What Nick said is the point of the thread, or to add more to the plate is that our team here doesn't really know the best way to communicate. What this means is that if a situation rises up either an admin does it anyways, or that they ask a lone bureaucrat to take up the opportunity or grant them access. It's not bad when a bureaucrat gives permission, but I think that we need to put a team together and have admin meetings to deal with situations and rule changes (and on that I don't think we should eliminate rule proposals on threads, I think that talking about rule changes/updates/new rules can be needed to spruce things up and then proposed to a thread on here for community consensus). It can be on a certain date, or it can be called out by whatever admins can be called (like I had did when the drama on TPWC was getting out-of-control).

I'm not suggesting that you guys need an alternative way to discuss a situation; the chat here is a great tool--just that you need chat hacks for multi pms if you're conducting one. If chat hacks aren't working, then CPN chat.