Board Thread:Site Questions/@comment-5619531-20140430193807/@comment-5619531-20140430210643

EmpyrealInvective wrote: I agree, but I don't think all the fault lies on admins. Some of the onus must fall on the writers (to preview and understand how to effectively post stories here, even if it means reading boring how-to's and helpful guides on the wiki.) and readers to defend work that they think have literary merit. (Also remind me to get you in my corner the next time one of my stories gets deleted.)

I mean if someone is tasked with removing low quality stories, they have a tendency to get tunnel vision and then it is Sturgeon's Law run amok and even decent stories can begin to look meh.

Also, I really need to sit down and read the Humper-Monkey's Ghost Story... Yeah. It kind of lies between the users. But they really don't know what Source Mode is when they get warned about using source mode. To me, if they are just going to delete stories because the author doesn't know soure mode and posts Example A, they should use the Use Source Mode template to warn those users.