Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-25052433-20150919183325/@comment-26475253-20150921205834

HumboldtLycanthrope wrote: @MarbleHornet, I love those stories, bro, and wasn't putting them down. What I was doing was very sarcastically and ironically saying they are classic and should not be touched. Also, by "fixing" JTK you may just lose whatever charm the nasty little story had. Alright, knowing that, I apologize for jumping the gun on my view of what you had said. On JtK's charm, I'm uncertain as to whether or not those two should be used in a sentence that doesn't include "Lack of". I'm 100% with you on the fact that this shouldn't happen.

It will only encourage writers to think more like JtK and less like actual writers. It'll essentially be willingly contaminating ourselves, and I doubt many people will be periodically searching for JtK once they know how absolutely shitty it is, so it probably won't change people's views on pasta. It might just show them how much we rely (not saying we do) on the JtK story for a fanbase.