User blog comment:Sloopernicus/The Shallowness of the Jeff the Killer Fandom/@comment-5239282-20140503024933/@comment-9780519-20140504191833

You used satire wrong. "Satire is a genre of literature, and sometimes graphic and performing arts, in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, government or society itself, into improvement. Although satire is usually meant to be humorous, its greater purpose is often constructive social criticism, using wit as a weapon and as a tool to draw attention to both particular and wider issues in society." That's kind of what I did with this post.

"my opinion being I thought we were done with these comments" That's just your opinion. Two admins have replied to this post with their thoughts on the subject, not going "this shouldn't be up here" Then you use the term unneccessary, which is why I brought up your posts. If this is unneccessary.

Blog posts, in the traditional sense, are where people can record observations and thoughts. That's what I did. I'm not calling any one to arms against the fandom, I'm not doing some "Proposal: Should we get rid of these guys". In other words, I'm putting my thoughts out there, and listening/responding to what people say about it. I'm not asking for a vote, I'm not asking for a change on the site. That's what forums are used for, in the traditional sense. By that logic, if forums are there for communication between people on the site, what is the point of the highly-controversial chat?

Basically you're just saying that you want to derail my blog with your own subject. I don't have to dissect your comment. Especially when it went off hand from this topic and was just a "oh this shouldn't be here response". That's something you start your own blog post, or forum thread since you don't think blogs are the place to people to write down their opinion/observance of something.

How is bringing up someones past actions old and tired? You said my post was unnecessary, when a little over a month ago you're posting about "should I or shouldn't I watch a porno", which to me seems way more unecessary. A month isn't that long ago, just because you want to say it is. If a someone drives drunk, hits someone then tries to talk down someone because he/she sees them smoking, doesn't the smoker have the right to mention how Mr/Ms McDrunky plowed into someone while hammered?

Why does anyone need to maintain credibility? Again, I'm not recruiting people for a cause, I'm just writing about something I noticed.

I'll say it again, I don't care what compliments you give me, when you say my blog post is unnessary, I'm gonna laugh and point out that you're not really putting out anything that great either.

Being around somewhere longer doesn't make you an authority figure. "Although I’d like to think I have enough site experience (two years; chances are more than you have, though I don’t know) to have the reputation of an authority figure" is basically saying "you should listen to me noob". I would think that if your time on the site granted you authority, I would be seeing the title of "admin" next to your name instead of "football-player rapist"