Talk:Jeff the Killer 2015/@comment-27905100-20170119051716

Been doing some comment reading, and I've decided to make something detailing and answering to what I've read so far:

1. Original JtK was better, but this is still good.

No, the original Jeff the Killer kind of sucked. It swapped tenses, had many jumps in logic and strange loopholes, and don't even try to explain away the interpersonal interactions in it. It just wasn't good.

2. This was terrible.

I have to say, you guys are being kind of tough on a guy who remade a story like the original Jeff into something like this. It may not be his best work, but it's quite a bit better than... oh, say, I don't know... the original? Think about how far it's come: Jeff's injuries are realistic, the characters act like they aren't cardboard cutouts, I could go on a long way. This isn't bad at all.

3. You changed my Mary-Sue lore! Now I have to redraw my BEN/Jeff ships!

Should I have to explain this?

4. This is worse than the original. It's not even scary.

Go to the deleted page log. Read the original. Come back. Read this. That should prove the point I've made.

As for the not scary part, if it's the plot, the author can hardly change that. It's tough to try and rewrite something to be recognisable and have it also be scary if the original plot is shit. If it's not the plot, look at yourself. This is the internet. Is anyone really going to care about your one dopey comment? And even if they do, everyone has different tastes and needs different things to scare them (I myself am a fan of 'boogeyman' style pastas). Respect others tastes by not telling them that their opinion is wrong, because yours just as likely has the same flaws.

That's all I could find so far. I hope this helps debunk anything insulting you were going to comment. While I agree this wasn't BanningK's Best work, it sure as hell wasn't as bad as I thought the original was.