Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-25503758-20130921172529/@comment-23780813-20130921180354

LOLSKELETONS wrote: I think we should encourage people to use "Marked for Review" more as a way of tagging pastas that may not be up to this site's standards. If it's not a new page and it's not in M4R, there's a good chance that it's already been reviewed and accepted by an admin.

Of course, that's not the case right now seeing as a lot of old pages are really bad, but it could be if we used M4R for more than just fixing grammar/spelling in pastas. After all, the author should have proofread and everything before submitting. How well does relying on the authors to fix there stuff BEFORE they put it here work? How many users read the spinoff rules before posting? How many spinoff appeal pastas aren't actually spinoffs? And now without the AbuseFilter work is going to get much harder.