Board Thread:Administration/@comment-2240864-20140808225958/@comment-5239282-20140809174326

Xelrog T. Apocalypse wrote: Or, quite possibly, the pasta actually didn't meet quality standards, and one shouldn't immediately assume that the admin has made a mistake because he or she is some tyrannical dictator.

Honestly, the admins on this site (and Spinpasta for that matter) get enough crap. If one wants to know why a pasta was deleted, one need only ask the admin who deleted it, which is plain to see in the page's history. If one doesn't like the answer given, he or she can contest it with another admin. It's a very simple system, and calling nazi on admins in every unrelated forum thread won't have any positive outcome. So please, just stop. You're grossly exaggerating this situation. First, Cleric asked us directly if we had any questions and recommendations for site maintenance. While I agree Wonder could've presented his problem differently (and used a more-appropriate system), it still fit Cleric's original question. He didn't come off rude, attacking admins either, like you said. It was an earnest question and you mistook it for something malicious.

I'm more concerned about months-old pastas that get dismissed just now, especially when the author isn't around anymore, though. They probably don't even know the Writer's board exists, haha.

"Does not meet quality standards" tells me jack shit, and doesn't allow me to determine whether it's worth the time and energy of both me and the admin to go back and judge it again. Due to the constant stream of new content, unless you constantly sought them out or got really lucky with the Random Page function, you seldom saw deletion polls anyway.

Also, nobody gives a fuck about the admins here~ <3