Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-36572169-20180813133907/@comment-25471033-20180813205023

Would you consider famous novels and plays, like shakespear, Of Mice and Men, and other things as art, even though they are also considered literature? Most things could be considered an art, and as we already stated, art can be considered art somewhere, and not somewhere else, so culture is also a huge factor in this. Also, one way you can consider if creepypasta is an art is if, like you said, there were certain movements. Was there a point in time when like, say, entities were the big thing to write about, but then ten years down the line, video games were? But what defines a movement anyways? Is it when the focus of the story itself changes, or the feeling the story gives you (i.e. the video game and entity thing, or maybe from terrifying that you can't sleep, to unsettling that you can't be alone?)  However, I believe that, regardless of if you count it as art or not, it's definitely not the quality of the pieces of art you view, or the literature you read, because as we all know, there are some very famous paintings that we look at, or stories we read and think "My unborn child could paint/draw/write better than that."

So end point, Creepypasta is an art form if you really want it to be, even if nobody in the world will agree with you :D

(P.S. don't feel bad about the clumsiness of your points, as you can see, mine are also all over the place)