Board Thread:Writer's Workshop/@comment-10319977-20151014231140/@comment-24881871-20151016172151

FrenchTouch wrote: @Likferd, not necessarily, some of it is actually good, really. But sure, if you just focus on Angelz's response to criticism, your bias is gonna be massive, and that's just silly. And stupid.

Even bearing in mind how awfully he reacted to his deletion appeal being rejected, how he spammed the admins' talkpages, how he accused Empy—who was the third admin to review his work—of being biased, etc., I've put that aside and given him some tips on how to write a good micropasta. But even now he's up to his old antics of arguing everything to death. His stories wouldn't be here if there weren't any problems with them. He's been trying to strongarm the administration into putting his pastas back up because a couple anons wrotse "wow this is pretty good" on his pastas and he took it was world-class criticism. At this point all these pastas need to be scrapped. Each one took less than five minutes, so he couldn't have spent more than half an hour total. And yet he's spent days trying to goad people into liking them. It's just not working. No amount of arguing will change that.