Talk:The Alice Killings/@comment-25184942-20150216152014/@comment-27090533-20151018075958

That would make sense, except it wouldn't, because it doesn't.

1. How many people who have heard of Alice have actually read Lewis Carrol's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland? I have -- but I have yet to meet someone else who has as well. Point is, you don't have to view the source material of something in order to be acquainted with its characters and other aspects, especially when this pertains to popular culture. (ex.: Homestuck, Marvel's Cinematic Universe)

2. You bring up the probability of random attacks yet your following arguments are of the hardly possible notion that the victims were somehow connected?

Yes, what are the chances that a singer who regularly performs at Yoshida's and not the first victim's restaurant would have a concert atendant that would become a victim -- and that the killer wanted his next victim(s) to be high schoolers as well, and got that damn lucky when (s)he picked a random house and killed two kids who just happened to be high schoolers? ...not very high, that's what.

For that to happen (assuming the murders all occured in the same town/city) it would have to be a small town...which would mean the killer would have to have been noticed in a town so small.

3. Basic reading is not difficult to learn, especially with Japanese phonetics.

4. Unless one is super rich and famous or an alien, we're all just "regular with nothing special"; doesn't mean we want to be noticed that badly. Yes, this killer was mentally disturbed, but I doubt their reason to kill was "I want senpai to notice me!"...

5. Refer to point one to see why this murderer didn't neccesarily have to read Alice's Adventures in Wonderland just to be inspired by the character. Then consider the fact that reading a single book does not mean that one has a preferred genre or even that one enjoys reading to begin with.

6. Sure, your list is short -- but what's it worth if it doesn't seem to follow the laws of probable cause. A longer list, if well explained can be provide much more relevant of an argument than a consise little poo.

7. I think you need to think a little harder on the validity and credibility of your arguements.