User blog comment:PUMPED4FRUIT&DAIRY/Pasta Noir: Dames, Slugs, and the Hatchetman/@comment-25148755-20150228015024

I haven't actually read this Pasta Noir yet. However, if you are actually claiming that it is the worst pasta you've ever read, then by default this must be the only pasta you've ever read, or you are just the worst kind of troll.

I'm all about constructive criticism (seriously...the one line about myself on my user page is 'constructive criticism welcome'). Nobody on here is a professional writer, because if we were, we'd be off selling our stories to publishers rather than posting them for free on the internet. That means everyone here has significant room for improvement in their writing.

So while I can definitely agree with you that there is a certain degree of "circle-jerking" that goes on (seen plenty of comments along the lines of "this pasta was kinda meh.  plot was decent.  twist was pretty cliche.  9.9/10") there is a right and a wrong way to go about delivering that criticism. The hellish thing is that, if you take away all the name calling and homophobic language, you would have had a detailed, well-thought review that probably would have been received with grace, even if the author didn't agree with your criticism; he'd have probably been flattered you took the time to write such an in depth critique. Instead you have this mess, which is worse than useless; any actually legitimate points you possibly made are now lost because you decided to act like an immature asshole instead of the (I'm assuming) educated adult you are. Congratulations: you failed.

TL;DR: Critique constructively or GTFO, troll