Talk:Laughing Jack/@comment-25655620-20141227172335/@comment-25655620-20141231170006

EVERYTHING.

1: I get what you're saying, and yes, it's true. I see the so called "blanks" in a story as simply plot holes. But it's also true that leaving "blanks" for the reader's imagination doesn't work with this specific story, or even creepypastas in general, creepypastas usually have a style of writing that explains things trough story-telling, not leaving gaps here and there.

2: I guess it could be that, but i still think the story should have handled that thing better. 1 point in your favor anyway.

3: That's just a theory, and this also a problem: by not knowing anything about the monster we can't be sure of what the hell he is thinking, if the story said at least something about him then we could try and make theories, but we simply have no materials to work with. Also I don't think this theory is right because Jack never showed anger or anything at the mother, it was all about the kid. This could have worked if Jack didn't wanted to murder the kid, but killed the mother because she didn't believe he was real. See? I just made the story better.

4:Oh come on! That's just stupid, do you really think that past police coldn't even make a mother with his son stay at the station for one night after someone destroyed their house and killed a dog? I'll just say it, in case anyone was wondering: in a situation like that, any police officer (of any time) would have to evacuate the house and keep everything intact as an evidence for further investigation, so what they did couldn't happen in real life (of any time).

Now, I saw that your counter arguments became less and less with every comment, so, if you wanna write another one, be my guest, if you don't want to, don't. But hey! you made me change idea on two of my points! Bravo! I'm not joking, I don't change idea that easily.

And just for re-cap: the story is bad, not terrible like SONIC.EXE, if this wasn't popular or even if this was posted today it would be off this wiki in one two three go! Agreed?