User blog comment:StrangerThanTad/What happened to Slimebeast's pastas?/@comment-5943448-20170929184631/@comment-5943448-20171001194543

Well, here we go with one of these, again.

" An opinion, and how rational people deal with arguments."

You followed an opinion with an opinion.

"And based on 'critical thinking', you've uncovered that mods have a circle jerk of mutual promotion..."

Critical thinking in that I'm looking at public events critically, instead of just "herp de derp welp I guess I'll just always assume the best like an idiot".

"based on 5 of 12 featured authors being mods,"

Based nearly half of features authors being staff, based on staff members co-promoting each other, based on staff with no edit history reflecting actual mod duties and instead only showing edits to their own work, based on watching staff members repeat the same disinformation that can only spread by telling each other what to think/say, ... Should I continue?

"but never looking into how competent they are as writers,"

I started taking note of this after I critiqued one of the featured staff's work, and was attacked for it. The fact you think I haven't read their work - based on NOTHING OTHER THAN YOU ASSUMING THAT - shows you're willing to just say anyything that will support your false narrative.

"cause not searching for avaiable evidence when making an accusation is what critical thinkers do."

Again, I've looked deeper into this than you can imagine. You're being pathetic, now, with all of these random nonsense statements.

"And no, you didn't have suspicions, you had assertions that you're now hoping are confirmed."

I like how you think there can be assertions without a prerequisite suspicions. Dumb.

"What exactly are the wrongdoings?"

Pay more attention.