User blog comment:SlickGR/Most Strict Wiki Ever/@comment-24101790-20150619224347/@comment-5577344-20150619230936

Trust me I get that, just had to let it out because it just seems a bit strange that 3 crappy stories I wrote from when I was 14 (and was marked for a review) somehow managed not to get deleted, yet this one is marked for deletion I just don't understand. I completely understand how parts are bland and may seem rehashed but then again aren't most stories? I'm always up for constructive criticism, so long as it is constructive and not blunt or rude, this is not in response to the recent story I put up but a previous story that was deleted got very poor criticism where most seemed to talk far too negatively over the smallest mistake. I always mark my stories and shorts for review as I tend to get useful advise (and I very much have from the most recent), just seems a little odd to me though. (I also feel if people want to help me in improving by pointing out the errors they should be a lot more specific than just using singular words like 'rehashed' or 'bland').