User blog comment:Sloopernicus/The Shallowness of the Jeff the Killer Fandom/@comment-5239282-20140503024933/@comment-5239282-20140504214348

I addressed my incorrect use of the word satire in an earlier post, so ignoring that…

You basically restated what I just said. Yeah, it’s my opinion. I don’t care if two admins have shared their thoughts on your blog; they aren’t a part of this conversation. The entire point of publishing your opinion on the internet is, of course, for discussion of it (more exposure). I don’t see your point in that.

I also grasp that blogs are used entirely for discussion; it merely seems repetitive with forums and whatnot. The chat has a lot of significance on the wiki; despite being a branch, it’s a lot of the times an introduction to many users. This has been brought up in the past, and proposals to disable both blogs and chat haven’t taken off. In the latest post in which I said blogs aren’t that necessary, I never specifically mentioned your own. In fact, I thought we were past that. But, regardless.

I’m not “basically” saying anything. It’s all interrelated to Jeff and his fandom. It’s your choice whether to read and meditate upon a comment or not. You don’t even need to have a written response. I didn’t care until you posted the initial reply. You had a choice to ignore; post a “compliant” answer to my question; or try and needlessly defend your blog post like you did. Lo and behold, this is what it amounts to. I’ll try not to make it sound like I’m shifting the blame, but you certainly did have a clear choice.

I meant “old and tired” in the sense that attacking someone for their past actions has been used countless times before when you run out of ideas; and each and every time, all discredited. Again, my sense of time is my opinion in effect. I don’t care if you have a different opinion than mine – though that’s certainly normal. I’m not even going to get into your little moral sidestory, as it’s completely unrelated to the topic at hand. Why do you deem my actions as unnecessary when you feel the need to include such a distracting anecdote?

I don’t think – nor did I say – that users have to maintain their credibility. Though it’s certainly programmed into you as soon as you initiate yourself into an organization. It’s not something to be controlled manually; it’s something that’s dependant on your actions. Keep in mind all that I’ve posted is heavily opinionated – slightly more subjective than here, no doubt. I don’t need to back my opinion with evidence because it’s an opinion. Same with a question; it needs no rhyme or reason, only to be asked. You could’ve formulated a coherent response without, like I said, bringing up the past.

Let me review my phrasing: I’d like to think I have enough reputation. You mistake my opinions for facts that you deny. Again, I never “basically” said anything. Nothing’s ever as black-and-white, especially with words. I never implied you’re a noob. You seem to be doing fairly well in the community. It’s you who mentioned that I sounded like an authority figure. What I said was neither in agreement nor absolute denial; it’s more of a “maybe.” You don’t know my motives for sticking around so long as a right-less user. Similarly, I think you could definitely qualify for Rollback, VCROC, or moderator, but you don’t.

My personal choice in title also doesn’t matter here. It’s in your best interest to refrain from bringing my usership up. In other words, stop making such short-sighted guesses.

It’s not that hard to decipher my words. I think you’re taking me a bit too literary/seriously. You need to calm down.