Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4715590-20131031211355/@comment-731871-20131104011744

You're acting like a hypocrite, 1.

2. I fail to see how your "PG-13 logic" exists when you allow jokes about Pedophilia and you allow excessive swearing like "C*NT" and "F*CK"

3.

Like I said. Whatever direction the rule goes, I feel that it must be ensured at adherement to the rule is balanced. Nobody gets away with anything if there are less or more users taking part, and ALL mods and ALL admins crack down on it for the same offense.

If that is too difficult to achieve, then the rule should not exist. Frankly, it's not fair or acceptable for a Wiki to ban users for some offenses and let others go because "The right person wasn't there adhering to the rules", "Multiple people were discussing it and it was all in good fun", "I was too tired to do anything or I was away and didn't see it", "Meh, They're just joking around", "My conduct changes based on my mood", or in a non-paraphrased case "Because some users need to stop being butthurt."

It's bad for the reputation of the wiki and it shows. If the rule will be adhered to a level that all Admins and mods agree to operate by, awesome. Not against it, after all, you are the legislation and this is the wiki you lead. If it can't be met, then corruption shows.