Board Thread:Chat Discussion/@comment-5619531-20140627155557/@comment-5619531-20140629041440

The Damn Batman wrote: Can I make a suggestion? I think we should try and make a to-do list of sorts to try and mazimize the effort put into the site. Since some users on the chat don't usually edit, maybe giving them specific jobs, or emphasizing on the things that need to be fixed would help the site. Last time we weren't organized, so maybe this time if we were, it might help a bit. Not saying we have to do this, but it was just an idea I had. It'll probably be a massive shit-fuck. That's what had happened when Callie proposed this situation the last time, and that got people opposing the chat shut-down. That's why I didn't propose that users should edit during this, but it is suggested if they're bored.

MC Metamorphike wrote: You can do what you want. In my opinion, this whole plan is only going to fix 50/80 of the problems here.

"The wiki's administration is way too corrupted, even the bureaucrats can't fix it."

- Ahri Chan To me, the administration is not really corrupt. If anything at all, it should be the users who do not follow regulations around the site, and the users who do not listen very well to ANYTHING the administration offers. Offer them critique or a reason why their article was deleted, "MY PASTA IS BETTER THAN FUCKING PSYCHOSIS. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE DAMN PRIVILEGE TO DELETE SOMETHING THAT I WROTE THAT MY PARENTS LIKED!"

A great example of this is the chat. Certain users have caused so much drama about mods kicking them for "nothing", but the mods have given them numerous warnings about not to do this thing. It has gotten to the point that we get pissed off that we kick troublemakers from time to time, that they still do not understand these warnings and they receive a ban. After the ban, and the reason of the ban on the ban log (or the message on their talk page, which I am the only that does that), they still bitch about their ban.

So don't blame it on the moderators or admins for not doing their job in the chat -- where it's not the admin's job to moderate the chat, but it is an option though -- blame it on the users who refuse to listen.