Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-36052213-20180802015552/@comment-5733573-20180803020658

HopelessNightOwl wrote: I'll set aside the "dead naming" thing for now (already mentioned it in previous post I just made), but if you consider "misgendering" to be an offense that should be against the rules, what you are basically implying is that a person should not be allowed to refer to a transgender person unless that person is willing to acknowledge the other's identity switch. If you don't believe in transgender identity to begin with, that basically means you are not allowed to refer to that person at all, which is a form of trying to force them to change their opinions. Maybe he shouldn't. You have no say in what another person's identity is. You have the right not to acknowledge whatever you want, but  the other person also has the right not to associate you if you don't accept their reality. It comes down to common courtesy. If someone says they identify a certain way, you're not in a position to tell them they don't.