Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-24376429-20140215165731/@comment-4778831-20140222191823

Princess Callie wrote: GnomeClaw wrote:

Princess Callie wrote:

ImGonnaBeThatGuy wrote: Honestly, I don't like the idea of people who aren't in approved positions to be doing deletion appeal. Just because chat moderators are trusted with chat doesn't automatically mean they should be trusted with quality control. FinalClaw proves this. I have to agree. It's nothing personal to Final, but when it comes to editing and quality control, he shortcuts a little too much. Well then tell me what I'm doing wrong, give advice on how to do it better. I mean, the main purpose I started editing/deleting, is because I want to help the wiki. Heck, no one even had asked me to do it. I simply asked if I could help doing it, so instead of just saying I'm doing badly. Tell me what exactly I'm doing badly at, and tell me how to improve it. Isn't that the main reason for this thread anyway? We've already told you. For example, relying on apps and spell check programs? Not a good idea. Not to mention, some articles you deleted with QC actually did pass the standards.

You're an excellent mod; not so much an editor. Well, I haven't been using spell check programs since the first problem someone pointed out when I used it. Which made me stop using one. As for the deletions, I've gone and now made lists of all the pastas I find, and when an admin or VCROC comes into the chat. I relay to him/her all the pastas with the reasons. With that both main issues would've been fixed. If I continue editing over time I will improve with it, and as my deleting taste also gets improved by the amount of successful pastas I relayed. Would that fix the main problems?