Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5371501-20130413185849/@comment-23893664-20130415125449

ObliterationoftheSelf wrote: Coffee Shop Corporate Raider wrote: ObliterationoftheSelf wrote: Calm yourself, it's only an internet discussion. The irony of that statement, in comparison to calling my previous comment an *censored because of apparent threat from staff I guess*, is golden. I see you don't understand what is ironic. More to that later.

"If you must insist to get yourself involved in a statement that had nothing to do with you to begin with, then I will gladly reword what I said in order to appease your personal ideas on what you *think* I should have said. Obviously, you are one of those who won't rest until you staple your idea that your own opinion is law, so to satisfy you, then I will reword what I said to be more appealing on the eyes of O' Mighty Oblit."

You just made a post right before mine about others having different opinions. And now you are obviously being passive aggressive to me because I have given my opinion to a matter which does not require me to be there to begin with, which offends you to the point of butthurt for some reason. Calling your post *censored because of apparent threat from staff I guess* and then pointing out your obvious passive aggressive butthurt is not ironic. Your earlier post is such.

I also pointed out as to why your post is factually incorrect. You have slandered me in return. Interestingly, for a person who claims to know me, you certainly seem to miss out that such a style is often how I will post and shouldn't bother you by now.

I'll disregard the immature attempt at "rewriting" which oh-so-conveniently does nothing to improve the actual content of the post as opposed to its tone and form. Not that it's right as to what I would "want" you to say, even if we went by what you were saying as truth in this part.

"Of course, I know you, so obviously you will find your way around this and attempt to prove yourself right, though it won't bother me in the longrun. Toodles." And you finish with not only an exceptionally pathetic ad hominem in an attempt to deflect any criticism, but, shall we say, totalitarian view on discussion, which sheds light onto your mindset.

God forbid anyone try to be right in an argument- nay, discuss anything at all, ever. Close down the internet, instate the most tyrannical dictatorship that could ever possibly conceived over all human beings, everyone; it's wrong to argue, according to Coffee.

Oh, I apologize- since your position doesn't allow me to voice my opinion or be right in a debate, I should reword what I said to be more appealing on the eyes of Cheese Lord. Point is that you rudely intervened in a discussion that did not concern you and decided to give your input (in a rude manner, in addition) that is un-administrative and generally barbaric in terms of behavior. You have a problem when it concerns sticking your nose in other people's business, and until you realize this, you will continue to abuse your power and invade other people's business. Your behavior is unproffesional and I believe you have been warned by Ben MULTIPLE times that staff does not and will not approve of this behavior, and yet you continue to persist. Again, you will ignore this, and continue to attempt at belittling and attacking me until you have your way, as that is who you *are*. Of course you bring in the word "butthurt" into the mix in a further attempt to shut me down for countering against a rude and inpolite comment, a comment in which you ignorantly stuck your nose into and sparked an argument.

Many others have noticed your behavior as well, so this is something you should really work on if you don't want to be desysoped. Again, toodles, though I doubt you'll learn anything.