Okay so apparently most of you don't know this but VCROC was first created to make admins without chat mod abilities. Now that we have no chat why don't we promote all VCROC to proper administrators and scrap the redundant group?
<p>We can still use VCROC as a means for vetting potential candidates for Admin as well. Without it, we would promote a user straight from rollback with little to no experience in how to manage the new rights.
</p>
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>EmpyrealInvective wrote:
We can still use VCROC as a means for vetting potential candidates for Admin as well. Without it, we would promote a user straight from rollback with little to no experience in how to manage the new rights.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>VCROC is only missing the ability to view deleted pages...
</p>
<div class="quote"><i>Shining-Armor wrote:
<p>VCROC is only missing the ability to view deleted pages...
</p>
</i></div>
<p>VCROC cannot delete blog posts as well.
</p>
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Shining-Armor wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>EmpyrealInvective wrote:
We can still use VCROC as a means for vetting potential candidates for Admin as well. Without it, we would promote a user straight from rollback with little to no experience in how to manage the new rights.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>VCROC is only missing the ability to view deleted pages...
</p>
</div>
<p>Yeah, but it still allows for bureaucrats to see how someone would handle that type of position. (As opposed to promoting someone who turns out to be a bad fit.) Why waste the time removing that title and promoting users who may/may not want the added responsibility of deletion appeal?
</p>
<p>The reasons for keeping are so incredibly stupid.
</p><p>"We can test their ability to be admin by giving them the same rights as an admin but give them a different name".
</p><p>You add maybe 4 extra things when you go from VCROC to Admin.
</p>