<p>Oh mai. Mah first poetry awn dis site!!!!111 Feedback is needed. I intend on the rhyming scheme to be all whacky; I tried to make it AAAA, BBBB, CCCC, DDDD, ect. So, feedback is needed!
</p>
<hr><div class="poem">
<p>The rain is coming out, and it's bringing its pain
Every time I think of the past again.
Can I shun these thoughts to keep me sane?
No, I cannot...
I think of the past every day
Every time that I come across, I delay.
"Is it alright for me to stay?
"Is it alright for me to go away?"
I usually go away to my hiding spot
The one spot that loves me no matter what
But I cannot find that spot, oh no I cannot.
The spot has disappeared, like the rest...
I plea to people who care about me
If they can set me free
From this trouble, and from this pain
If they can, then there is certainly a cure...
I cannot live another day
I cannot live to be a blind man one more day
I am hopelessly blind, too blind to face the truth
When the truth is right at me.
Here lies these scars, so bitter and sweet.
From my rain that was discreet
I wish I could find another spot, one to take away the pain
For, maybe one day, I will live truthfully again...
</p>
</div>
11,197
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Fatal Disease
<p>According to one of the (former) bureaucrats on the wiki, the site got shut down for offensive content and personal attacks.
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>My blurb: "Arthur Rumptz Jr., aka "Fatal Disease", is mainly a musician and hardly writes short stories, but when he does write it's usually something not serious (or that it's poems). Fatal Disease has been on the site for over two years now, and during his time here he has written only one short story. And that story he would like to share with you."
</p><p>Story: The Same
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>I'm really not too sure about this. I don't think that the mods should have more power than what they should have with creating rules and deciding which user gets modship, but I like when mods can handle situations on the site relating to the chat.
</p><p><span>
Neutral -</span> leaning towards oppose.
</p>
Neutral -</span> leaning towards oppose.
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Nihilus Nix Naught wrote:
A concern that was just brought up right now.
</p><p>I'd like to know why we weren't told that ask.fm links were banned. Like, 2 mods knew about that, nobody else.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Same with the dick joke banning. I'm not one to use them as I find them childish to be excessively used in the first place, but there wasn't a rule change stating that they were banned completely. Not being informed by the sudden rule changes are, what Weaver said, a concern from users—and definitely confusing. </p><p>What I meant by having mod's discretion emphasized or explained is to give more clarity to the users, not to explain what a mod has to do. There was a debate about this that made it an issue that I wanted to point out, but it got miscommunicated and dragged on to a certain topic. That, and being not updated by the rules and having few moderators know about certain updates that aren't on the chat rules for us to see. </p><p>How to fix this? I've been saying this for a while: I think we should get the header back from last year. This time not for silly quotes like "'Forever Young. I wanna be forever young.' - Bill Clinton." We should get it back only for updates in the rules, that way we can avoid this confusion. People are on at different times; figuring out a rule has been updated the hard way would cause issues between those who don't like to get kicked or banned. Anyways, here's what I'm talking about with the "header" </p> <div class="center"><figure class="article-thumb tnone show-info-icon" style="width: 690px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">Where it says "2spooky4me13 championship"</p> </figcaption></figure></div>
<p>Same with the dick joke banning. I'm not one to use them as I find them childish to be excessively used in the first place, but there wasn't a rule change stating that they were banned completely. Not being informed by the sudden rule changes are, what Weaver said, a concern from users—and definitely confusing. </p><p>What I meant by having mod's discretion emphasized or explained is to give more clarity to the users, not to explain what a mod has to do. There was a debate about this that made it an issue that I wanted to point out, but it got miscommunicated and dragged on to a certain topic. That, and being not updated by the rules and having few moderators know about certain updates that aren't on the chat rules for us to see. </p><p>How to fix this? I've been saying this for a while: I think we should get the header back from last year. This time not for silly quotes like "'Forever Young. I wanna be forever young.' - Bill Clinton." We should get it back only for updates in the rules, that way we can avoid this confusion. People are on at different times; figuring out a rule has been updated the hard way would cause issues between those who don't like to get kicked or banned. Anyways, here's what I'm talking about with the "header" </p> <div class="center"><figure class="article-thumb tnone show-info-icon" style="width: 690px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">Where it says "2spooky4me13 championship"</p> </figcaption></figure></div>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>How about we get rid of those who aren't capable of being mod right off the bat, then those who are at least decent enough can be critiqued on what they're doing wrong? It's not the best idea to handle this situation, but I can't come up with anything better to solve this issue other than what I had recommended.
</p><p>EDIT: I like the rubric idea.
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>This may sound incredibly stupid, but I think that we should get rid of most of the mod team (other than those who are liable enough to keep their position, maybe 3 or 4), promote those three users who can be trusted (unless if they are mods already), and wait and see if anyone trustworthy comes along. It's not really the end of the world if we're understaffed in the mod department; admins can promote temp-mods for the night or whenever this shortage appears when an admin has to leave. This is probably the best way of getting good mods by having people suggest who they want to be a mod (like what Empy did with Spicy). What happens after that is all up to you; you can have the apps process and these users apply and the regulars vote on their app, or that an admin/bureaucrat comes on and asks "How was *insert user name* doing with the mod job?"
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>I go bump; you go bump; we go bump; I go bump.
</p><p>(Bumping this since it isn't getting the recognition it needs.)
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>Oh, and I would like to point out is how the rules seem to change periodically. The rules seem to change a lot that it can make a person's head spin. And that's another thing that's hard to accomplish for the chat; no one can't seem to figure out what they like or dislike about the rules. One minute a selected group likes the rules, on the next minute the selected group dislikes the rules and want them changed.
</p><p>Another thing is how people seem to ignore "mod's discretion". I know that the chat shouldn't be a dictatorship—it shouldn't—but people tend to ignore that part and assume in a little debate about what they're doing. As said above, a mod shouldn't be above anyone in the chat or be too strict/ease-backed; but I do think that "mod's discretion" should be emphasized more, or at least explained.
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>EmpyrealInvective wrote:
Two possible titles:
</p><p><i>The Die Has Been Cast</i>
</p><p><s><i>Ill-Fated Rolls</i></s> Sounds too cheesy.
</p><p>And for the "lolz": <i>Dice to Meet you", </i>A Dice-y Occurrence", <i>Die!</i>
</p>
</i></div>
<p><span style="color: green;">> Die!</span> </p><p><span style="color: green;">> Stealing my creativity, just adding an exclamation mark</span> </p><p>Dammit, Empy! This is why we can't have nice things! </p>
<p><span style="color: green;">> Die!</span> </p><p><span style="color: green;">> Stealing my creativity, just adding an exclamation mark</span> </p><p>Dammit, Empy! This is why we can't have nice things! </p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>I don't know why the thread was un-highlighted since it does relate to the community, but anyways...
</p><p><i>Life in the Eyes of a Snake</i>
</p><p><i>The Power of God in Your Hands</i>
</p><p>And for lolz
</p><p><i>Die</i>
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<p>This is my opinion on this, but I think we need to stop talking about user rights and we need more self-control when "invasions" are occurring in the chat. That, and what Chaoz and Bitter said contributed to loads of drama on the chat, eventually leading to the second chat shutdown.
</p><p>What I mean by user rights is that one person talks shit about users with rights that are related to the chat and mostly everyone gets rallied up and starts drama relating to the topic. I personally think that if someone is doing bad with their righrs then it should be taken to a bureaucrat or the forums (with proof as to why they should be stripped away from their right).
</p><p>What I mean by everyone containing themselves when an "invasion" is occurring is when the mods are put into fear when someone from our wiki is visiting another wiki, someone says it's an invasion while the user isn't doing any harm on that chat, and someone from that wiki comes on but doesn't cause any harm too. Animefan visited the MLP wiki (Anime is a brony), and a few people visited to see what he was doing (some even edited on the site in the past, but none did nothing wrong in that category). Then a few users who "supposedly" came from that wiki to chat. The people from our site weren't doing anything wrong that got them banned on the MLP wiki, and neither did the users who came to chat--the only drama that happened there was when a couple of our mods were forcing out and accusing these users to be invading the chat and the accused were refuting back. The fear of Disney 2 needs to stop and when an invasion occurs the mods should handle it properly, not through fear.
</p><p>EDIT: Here's the chat log for what happened.
</p><p>http://creepypasta.wikia.com/wiki/Creepypasta_Wiki:Chat/Logs/November_01_2014?t=20141101193742
</p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Theglaukos wrote:
can anyone join the classes?
</p>
</i></div>
<p>If you read the proposal, yes. You can. But it cannot be "Oh. I wanna go for admin classes." You wouldn't do that. You can do rollback classes first then build your way up. It's just for the sake of trust, that's it. </p>
<p>If you read the proposal, yes. You can. But it cannot be "Oh. I wanna go for admin classes." You wouldn't do that. You can do rollback classes first then build your way up. It's just for the sake of trust, that's it. </p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>EmpyrealInvective wrote:
EmpyrealInvective's Sample Entry. Note: as I posted before October 18th, I invalidated myself from the costume contest. Take the time, read the rules, and you could win best costume.
</p><p>insert images here
</p><p>EmpyrealInvective/Travis as "A Clockwork Orange" Droog
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Holy shit. You have no idea how much I'm HNNNNNG-ing right now. </p>
<p>Holy shit. You have no idea how much I'm HNNNNNG-ing right now. </p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>1165abcd wrote:
What part of the site will the class be held
</p>
</i></div>
<p>The chat on crst. </p>
<p>The chat on crst. </p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Hayesdj wrote:
When will you be choosing?
</p>
</i></div>
<p>If you read the thread, all entries are due at or before Halloween. </p>
<p>If you read the thread, all entries are due at or before Halloween. </p>
(Edited by Fatal Disease)