BBackground found on Pinterest.

I know we can't make fanmade sequels to famous creepypastas

But could we make sequels to our own creepypastas?

I got like a story i want to do with my creepypasta but i don't want to jumble it into one big story and kinda want to separate it into three parts

[idk lol.]

You spend all week writing three short stories, look them over, then notice minor errors only after posting them.

Hi i am new to this wiki and i was the one who made the greenwood slasher creepypasta, i tried to avoid very obvious tropes and cliches and it still got deleted

I'm not sure if it was a spelling and grammar thing or a story thing. i wouldn't be surprise if it was my spelling because i have dyslexia and it kind of effect my spelling and causes me to make poorly structured sentences.

And i am asking if i fix my story could it be reuploaded back up on the wiki?

And if so what could i do to fix the story like any constructive critisim or advice.

I'm not angry i just want to know if theres some way i could re-upload this without it being taken down again

Background found on Pinterest.

Sorry for being gone for so long, I kept getting my posting thing blocked for no reason and had enough so I ended up quitting, but now I felt bad for quitting and decided to make a comeback, this time I'll include where I got the background image from when I post a found footage artwork.

I've been thinking about getting back into writing Creepypastas and gore-Esque poetry. Would anyone like to read any of my future writings so I have some form of motivation? ToT

Just wanted to take a moment to approach this subject after reviewing our commenting policy.

I've long since made a distinction between being a jerk/asshole, and being plain cruel, and while usually the distinction is fairly obvious, with regards to critiquing work, sometimes the two become interchangeable.

Remarks such as "this sucks", "this is cringe/trash" are to be considered unconstructive at best, and against terms of use at worst. I understand that I cannot possibly filter out every Youtube-bad-story-time-normie who's never heard of Creepypasta, but this also applies to regular users as well.

There's a reason why the authors who've stuck around the longest generally are the most amicable/communicative people here, and that's because they recognize that in order for us to continue keeping the Creepypasta culture alive, we have to approach constructive critique with a modicum of professionality and tact. We're not publishing stuff like Jeff the Killer anymore, and that's kind of why we should be toning back the Nostalgia Critic levels of "UGH, what were they THEEEEENKING?!?!" I'm not here to censor discussion, but what I WILL be doing is scrutinizing feedback that appears to have been made in bad faith.

TL;DR - don't be a dick. If you really think a story doesn't meet QS, mark the story for deletion or review and give your reasoning (as the site rules and respective templates dictate). I'd also encourage people to point out the elements of a story that DID work or interest you, and to ask questions to the author that would motivate them to improve upon these areas.

I would like to know if you guys would support the idea of movies based off of SCP object with a loose connection of being the Foundation.